Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make autocomplete work with entity ids #51633

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Kicu
Copy link
Contributor

@Kicu Kicu commented Oct 29, 2024

Details

  • this PR implements autocomplete for every filter that is not "plain text" but requires saving some ids of the entity the user actually chosen (from, to, in, tax, cardID)
  • we save the user autocomplete choice and later substitute query with the entity id before sending request to backend (details below)
  • contains very small change to autocomplete parser, and 2 functions which I put into separate files to write tests for them
  • important: this is only expected to work in SearchRouter, SearchPageHeader will still work using old code; I will make this autocomplete work also on Results page in SearchPageHeader but in a separate PR. Doing it in here would make this PR grow way over 1k loc

Detailed autocomplete description

new implementation

  • the main source of truth is still the "plain text" text input value that the users sees
  • in addition any time a user picks (clicks) a choice from autocomplete list, we save data in a substitutionsMap object
  • when we need to process the query we can always correctly substitute a string that user sees in his query with an autocompleteID of the entity that can be stored in URL and sent to backend; these ids can be accountID for a user or reportID for chat/room/report, and some other ids for tags and cards
  • old standardizeQueryJSON function can soon be removed, but this mechanism described above now only works for SearchRouter, whereas input inside SearchHeaderPage still uses the old substitution mechanism, and thus needs the function
  • tests for getQueryWithSubstitutions and getUpdatedSubstitutionsMap should help understand this

Fixed Issues

$ #50976
$ #50947
$ #50944
$ #50943
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • open SearchRouter via clicking on 🔎 icon or cmd +k shortcut
  • verify that when using contextual search (inside a room) room name is correctly displayed
  • test autocomplete for from:..., to:..., cardID:... and tax:...
  • in every case user should see plain text display name, but backend should receive id instead

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • open SearchRouter via clicking on 🔎 icon or cmd +k shortcut
  • verify that when using contextual search (inside a room) room name is correctly displayed
  • test autocomplete for from:..., to:..., cardID:... and tax:...
  • in every case user should see plain text display name and the search should work

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
rec-autocomplete-andr.mp4
screen-autocomplete-andr
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
rec-autocomplete-ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari ios
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
rec-autocomplete-web.mp4
MacOS: Desktop

@Kicu Kicu force-pushed the kicu/autocomplete-query-ids branch from 2cc15d1 to e3e559b Compare October 31, 2024 11:54
@Kicu Kicu marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2024 12:02
@Kicu Kicu requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2024 12:02
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 31, 2024

@rayane-djouah Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team October 31, 2024 12:02
@Kicu Kicu changed the title Autocomplete query ids WIP Make autocomplete work with entity ids Oct 31, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@SzymczakJ SzymczakJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@luacmartins luacmartins self-requested a review October 31, 2024 16:13
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking great! Left a few small comments.

NAB: @Expensify/design we might wanna find a way to differentiate between some of these reports. When I search for in:#admin I get a list of different reports, but I have no way of knowing which one is which. Maybe we can append the policy name to it?

Screenshot 2024-10-31 at 1 05 27 PM


.filter((details): details is NonNullable<PersonalDetails> => !!(details && details?.login))
.map((details) => ({
name: details.login ?? '',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might wanna use displayName ?? login here since I imagine most people would search based on names, not emails

return;
filteredAutocompleteSuggestions = filteredChats.map((chat) => ({
filterKey: CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS.IN,
text: chat.text ?? '',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ok for now, but we might have to add some more details to the name to help users differentiate multiple reports with the same name, e.g. admin rooms

const queryString = SearchQueryUtils.buildSearchQueryString(standardizedQuery);
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SEARCH_CENTRAL_PANE.getRoute({query: queryString}));

const computeNodeValueFn = SearchQueryUtils.getUpdatedAmountValue;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB this variable seems unnecessary, we can just pass the param inline

Suggested change
const computeNodeValueFn = SearchQueryUtils.getUpdatedAmountValue;
const computeNodeValueFn = SearchQueryUtils.getUpdatedAmountValue;

);

const onAutocompleteSuggestionClick = (autocompleteKey: string, autocompleteId: string) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const onAutocompleteSuggestionClick = (autocompleteKey: string, autocompleteId: string) => {
const onAutocompleteSuggestionClick = (autocompleteKey: string, autocompleteID: string) => {

import type {SearchAutocompleteQueryRange} from '@components/Search/types';
import * as parser from '@libs/SearchParser/autocompleteParser';

type SubstitutionEntry = {value: string};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need the value key here? AFAIK we always have the map as {[filterKey:typedValue]: {value: [id]}}. Could we simplify it to {[filterKey:typedValue]: [id]}?

Suggested change
type SubstitutionEntry = {value: string};
type SubstitutionEntry = {value: string};

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins I definitely think we should distinguish those somehow. Right now that list is basically unusable. There's a million ways we could do that, here are a few ideas:

image

I think I lean towards the simple dot separator pattern: in:#admins • Danny's Donuts. But let's see what @Expensify/design thinks or if they have any other/better ideas.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

luacmartins commented Nov 1, 2024

^ is being discussed here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants