Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Splitting up CI matrix for pip llnl #192

Merged
merged 47 commits into from
Aug 4, 2023
Merged

Splitting up CI matrix for pip llnl #192

merged 47 commits into from
Aug 4, 2023

Conversation

MishaZakharchanka
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR focuses on the pip CI for LLNL machines. The functionality of the tests remains the same, but the jobs will now be listed individually on gitlab. Additionally, there was organizational work done in an attempt to make the file more readable and maintainable.

@MishaZakharchanka
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Do we want to add Lassen back to the machines that we are testing on?

@mtitov
Copy link
Collaborator

mtitov commented May 17, 2023

Do we want to add Lassen back to the machines that we are testing on?

Yes.

And can you please investigate having a list of tags for $RUNNER_TYPE, since we need to add tag slurm for Slurm batch-runners (e.g., RUNNER_TYPE: [ "batch", "slurm" ]?)

.gitlab/llnl-ci-pip.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MishaZakharchanka

This comment was marked as resolved.

.gitlab/llnl-ci-pip.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.gitlab/llnl-ci-pip.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mtitov mtitov marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2023 22:03
Copy link
Collaborator

@mtitov mtitov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@mtitov mtitov merged commit 8a67441 into master Aug 4, 2023
13 of 21 checks passed
@mtitov mtitov deleted the refactor/llnl-ci-pip branch August 4, 2023 23:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants