Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 10, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

Devika-NH
Copy link

Adding one more db option-"local" for authentication

@Devika-NH Devika-NH closed this Dec 3, 2014
@Devika-NH Devika-NH reopened this Dec 3, 2014
@viveksd87
Copy link

Hi Devika,
Thank you for submitting a pull request.
But I have a question, is the change made for a specific case/scenario?
Because, based on an issue raised earlier, issue#5, we were planning to get rid of the hard coded database name and make it configurable from the command line using option --authDb.
So, the change made as per the PR might not be in sync with the solution we want to give.

Please let me know if you have any other thoughts on it.

Thanks,
Vivek

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants