Error with erpcgen in generating list<binary>

[arnoldgb-arm]

struct test_t{
  list<binary> var
}

When you generate cpp files for above erpc file, the erpcgen doesn't generate 'read_binary_t_struct' for *server.cpp and 'write_binary_t_struct' for *client.cpp. This causes the compilation to fail. Need help with this.

[github-actions]

Hi eRPC user. Thank you for your interest and welcome. We hope you will enjoy this framework well.

[Hadatko]

Hello, thank you for your bug report. Feel free to create PR. Otherwise i can look on it once i will have time for that (few weeks)

[Hadatko]

struct test_t{ list var }

When you generate cpp files for above erpc file, the erpcgen doesn't generate 'read_binary_t_struct' for *server.cpp and 'write_binary_t_struct' for *client.cpp. This causes the compilation to fail. Need help with this.

Can you show me an example how you are using this type in your IDL file? If it is not used than no serialization code may be generated.

correct IDL declaration
'''C
interface A{
oneway fun(binary T)
}
'''

correct IDL declaration 2
'''C
struct test_t{
binary var
}

interface A{
oneway fun(test_t T)
}

'''

correct IDL declaration 2
'''C
struct a{
list<binary> var
}

interface A{
oneway fun(list T)
}
'''

correct IDL declaration 3
'''C
struct test_t{
list<uint8> var
}

interface A{
oneway fun(test_t T)
}
'''

Generated files looks good to me.

[Hadatko]

@arnoldgb-arm Could you verify if it is still an issue? It looks ok for me with current eRPC version. See zip bellow:
acrios-erpc.zip

[arnoldgb-arm]

struct test_t{
list<binary> a
}

interface handler {
  fun(test_t V) -> int32
  get() -> test_t
}

This was the one causing error. Sorry for the confusion

[Hadatko]

@arnoldgb-arm Now i see and confirming the bug. You are actually missing read binary for client and write binary for server.

[Hadatko]

@arnoldgb-arm as temporary solution you can use:

'''C
struct test_t{
list< list<uint8> > a
}

interface handler {
fun(test_t V) -> int32
get() ->test_t
}
'''

[arnoldgb-arm]

Thank you!

[Hadatko]

Actually this solution looks not working too. So the issue is more generic than i thought. I will try to fix this asap. I am susprised that our tests are passing.

[Hadatko]

I found a bug and gods are merciful as it looks like i found also solution which looked be complicated, but it is simple.