You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2025. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 31, 2025. It is now read-only.
Right now, there's not really a way to specify binding location, etc. - we need to figure that out. Relatedly, either figure out a way to use statics to declare all the bind-y stuff, or decide we're going with parameters.
This could be a temp hack/workaround until we figure out more what the final design should look like, in the linked higher-level issue.
To give a concrete end goal for this issue, this will track when the foundations of 19 are implemented - specifically, I want things like this comment to be able to be specified. #19 (comment)
Activity
Jasper-Bekkers commentedon Oct 10, 2020
#19
khyperia commentedon Oct 16, 2020
To give a concrete end goal for this issue, this will track when the foundations of 19 are implemented - specifically, I want things like this comment to be able to be specified. #19 (comment)
khyperia commentedon Oct 20, 2020
This is almost done, just need to add some attributes, and fiddle with moving outputs to return values re: discussion in discord.
khyperia commentedon Nov 3, 2020
As discussed in the meeting, we're not moving outputs to return values, as that'd be wasted effort until the bindings rfc is finished.