Skip to content

Conversation

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

@ekluzek ekluzek commented Nov 11, 2025

Description of changes

Update submodules to cesm3_0_alpha07g levels. And bring in a few things beyond that level with useful things to bring in.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @billsacks @wwieder

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #3599
Fixes #3483

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No No

Testing performed, if any: will run aux_clm, ctsm_sci and fates on Derecho/Izumi

…ght be useful, as well as a cmeps branch which will be useful and to test that it works in aux_clm
@ekluzek ekluzek added this to the cesm3_0_beta08 milestone Nov 11, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek self-assigned this Nov 11, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek added enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability code health improving internal code structure to make easier to maintain (sustainability) labels Nov 11, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek added the bfb bit-for-bit label Nov 11, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Ready to start (or start again) in CTSM: Upcoming tags Nov 13, 2025
@wwieder wwieder moved this from Ready to start (or start again) to In progress - master in CTSM: Upcoming tags Nov 13, 2025
@wwieder wwieder moved this from In progress - master to In progress - b4b-dev in CTSM: Upcoming tags Nov 13, 2025
@wwieder
Copy link
Contributor

wwieder commented Nov 13, 2025

@ekluzek, since this is ready to go and going to b4b dev, can you just go ahead a merge this when you're ready. I've put it to the top of the b4b upcoming tags that are in progress.

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Nov 22, 2025

Actually, I've been running into issues here, so it isn't ready to go.

One issue is that the CISM tag changes answers, so we'll bring it in seperately.

…rs, because of the change in the 4km GRIS grid
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Nov 22, 2025

These tests showed a change in answers because of CISM:

ERI_D.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam7LndTuningModeLDust
ERP_D_Ld5.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm50BgcCropG.derecho_gnu.clm-glcMEC_changeFlags
ERP_D_Ld9.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam6LndTuningMode
ERP_D_Ld9.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam7LndTuningModeLDust
ERP_D_Ld9.ne30pg3_t232.IHistClm60BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam7LndTuningModeLDust
ERP_P256x2_D_Ld5.f19_g17_gris4.I1850Clm50BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-glcMEC_increase
ERP_P64x2_D_Ld10.f10_f10_mg37.IHistClm50SpG.derecho_intel.clm-glcMEC_decrease--clm-nofireemis
ERP_P64x2_Ld396.f10_f10_mg37.IHistClm60Bgc.derecho_intel.clm-monthly--clm-matrixcnOn_ignore_warnings             EXPECTED POSSIBILITY
ERS_D_Ld12.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm50BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-glcMEC_spunup_inc_dec_bgc
ERS_D_Ld9.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam7LndTuningMode
ERS_Ly3_P64x2.f10_f10_mg37.IHistClm50BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-cropMonthOutput
SMS_Lm1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCropCrujraG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam7LndTuningMode
SMS_Lm1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm60BgcCropG.derecho_intel.clm-clm60cam7LndTuningMode
SMS_Ly3.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm50SpG.derecho_intel.clm-glcMEC_long--clm-nofireemis

And one failing test that's unexpected:

ERR_Ld7.f10_f10_mg37.IHistClm60BgcCrop.derecho_gnu.drv-interim_restart (NLCOMP RUN)

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Nov 22, 2025

This is also updated to a cime based off of cime6.1.137, as updated to cime6.1.142 had cases die in setup, which look like is due to the namelist case change that comes in with cime6.1.138.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bfb bit-for-bit code health improving internal code structure to make easier to maintain (sustainability) enhancement new capability or improved behavior of existing capability

Projects

Status: In progress - b4b-dev
Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants