Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tests failing in ctsm5.2.019 for CESM alpha testing #2702

Closed
ekluzek opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2829
Closed

Tests failing in ctsm5.2.019 for CESM alpha testing #2702

ekluzek opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2829
Assignees
@slevis-lmwg
Labels
bug something is working incorrectly done Issues whose closing PR is done but not yet merged (pending test re-run ok) priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations
Milestone
cesm3_0_beta05

Comments

@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator

ekluzek commented Aug 15, 2024

Brief summary of bug

@fischer-ncar found some CTSM prealpha tests that fail in the cesm3_0_alpha03a tag.

General bug information

CTSM version you are using: ctsm5.2.019

Does this bug cause significantly incorrect results in the model's science? No

Configurations affected: Tests with grid alias ne30pg3_t061

Details of bug

Important output or errors that show the problem

FAIL SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t061.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist--clm-matrixcnOn CREATE_NEWCASE
  ERROR: no alias ne30pg3_t061 defined

FAIL SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t061.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist CREATE_NEWCASE
  ERROR: no alias ne30pg3_t061 defined
@ekluzek ekluzek added bug something is working incorrectly priority: Immediate Highest priority, something that was unexpected labels Aug 15, 2024
@ekluzek ekluzek added this to the cesm3_0_beta03 milestone Aug 15, 2024
@ekluzek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ekluzek commented Sep 25, 2024

There are several tests in our testlist in ctsm5.3.0 that reference _t061 and should be removed and changed to _t232

@ekluzek ekluzek added priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations and removed priority: Immediate Highest priority, something that was unexpected labels Sep 27, 2024
@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2024
Merged
@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg added the done Issues whose closing PR is done but not yet merged (pending test re-run ok) label Oct 7, 2024
@samsrabin samsrabin linked a pull request Oct 11, 2024 that will close this issue
Merge b4b-dev (2024-10-10) #2829
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg

Labels
bug something is working incorrectly done Issues whose closing PR is done but not yet merged (pending test re-run ok) priority: high High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations
Projects
LMWG: Near Term Priorities
Archived in project
Milestone
cesm3_0_beta05
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Merge b4b-dev (2024-10-10) samsrabin/CTSM
2 participants
@ekluzek @slevis-lmwg