fix organization code #768
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis update introduces a migration script to standardize organization codes by converting them to lowercase and replacing whitespace with underscores, while temporarily disabling and re-enabling relevant foreign key constraints. Additionally, input validation for organization codes and router methods has been tightened to enforce stricter, more consistent patterns. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~18 minutes Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/validators/v1/organization.js (1)
2-2: Fix incorrect file name in header commentThe header comment references "validators/v1/admin.js" but this file is "organization.js".
- * name : validators/v1/admin.js + * name : validators/v1/organization.js
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/database/migrations/20250729064710-org-code-fix.js(1 hunks)src/routes/index.js(1 hunks)src/validators/v1/organization.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/routes/index.js (1)
73-73: LGTM! Consistent validation pattern across parametersThe updated regex pattern now matches the validation used for
controllerNameandfileparameters, improving consistency across the codebase.src/database/migrations/20250729064710-org-code-fix.js (1)
100-108: No unique constraint onorganizations.code
Theorganizationstable (defined in 20230602091639-create-organizations-table.js) does not enforce uniqueness on thecodecolumn (nor on the(code, tenant_code)pair), so this migration will not run into a unique‐constraint violation even if two entries normalize to the same value. If you do intend to enforce uniqueness, add a dedicated migration to create a unique index/constraint onorganizations(code, tenant_code)and handle any existing duplicates at that time.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| table = 'organization_user_invites' | ||
| fk_name = 'fk_org_user_invites_organization_id' | ||
| fkey = '(organization_code, tenant_code)' | ||
| refTable = 'organizations' | ||
| refKey = '(code, tenant_code)' | ||
| await queryInterface.sequelize.query(disableFK(table, fk_name), { | ||
| type: Sequelize.QueryTypes.RAW, | ||
| raw: true, | ||
| transaction, | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate foreign key constraint handling
The migration attempts to drop the same constraint twice for the organization_user_invites table but with different constraint names. This appears to be handling different naming conventions, but only one enableFK is added to fk_retainer.
Verify if both constraints exist and ensure both are properly restored:
table = 'organization_user_invites'
fk_name = 'fk_org_user_invites_org_code'
fkey = '(organization_code, tenant_code)'
refTable = 'organizations'
refKey = '(code, tenant_code)'
await queryInterface.sequelize.query(disableFK(table, fk_name), {
type: Sequelize.QueryTypes.RAW,
raw: true,
transaction,
})
fk_retainer.push(enableFK(table, fk_name, fkey, refTable, refKey))
table = 'organization_user_invites'
fk_name = 'fk_org_user_invites_organization_id'
fkey = '(organization_code, tenant_code)'
refTable = 'organizations'
refKey = '(code, tenant_code)'
await queryInterface.sequelize.query(disableFK(table, fk_name), {
type: Sequelize.QueryTypes.RAW,
raw: true,
transaction,
})
+ fk_retainer.push(enableFK(table, fk_name, fkey, refTable, refKey))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| table = 'organization_user_invites' | |
| fk_name = 'fk_org_user_invites_organization_id' | |
| fkey = '(organization_code, tenant_code)' | |
| refTable = 'organizations' | |
| refKey = '(code, tenant_code)' | |
| await queryInterface.sequelize.query(disableFK(table, fk_name), { | |
| type: Sequelize.QueryTypes.RAW, | |
| raw: true, | |
| transaction, | |
| }) | |
| table = 'organization_user_invites' | |
| fk_name = 'fk_org_user_invites_organization_id' | |
| fkey = '(organization_code, tenant_code)' | |
| refTable = 'organizations' | |
| refKey = '(code, tenant_code)' | |
| await queryInterface.sequelize.query(disableFK(table, fk_name), { | |
| type: Sequelize.QueryTypes.RAW, | |
| raw: true, | |
| transaction, | |
| }) | |
| fk_retainer.push(enableFK(table, fk_name, fkey, refTable, refKey)) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/database/migrations/20250729064710-org-code-fix.js around lines 65 to 75,
the migration drops two foreign key constraints on the organization_user_invites
table but only adds one enableFK call to fk_retainer. Verify if both constraints
exist in the database schema and if so, add corresponding enableFK calls for
both constraints to fk_retainer to ensure both are properly restored during
rollback.
| raw: true, | ||
| transaction, | ||
| }) | ||
| console.log(fetchOrgs) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove console.log statements from migration
Production migrations should not contain console.log statements. Use proper logging if needed.
- console.log(fetchOrgs)
- console.log('Transaction committed successfully.')Also applies to: 172-172
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/database/migrations/20250729064710-org-code-fix.js at lines 154 and 172,
remove the console.log statements as production migrations should not contain
them. If logging is necessary, replace console.log with a proper logging
mechanism consistent with the project's logging standards.
| async down(queryInterface, Sequelize) { | ||
| console.warn( | ||
| 'Down migration not implemented: Cannot reliably restore original whitespace in organization codes.' | ||
| ) | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement down migration for rollback capability
The down migration is not implemented, which means this migration cannot be rolled back. While the transformation is indeed irreversible (we can't know which underscores were originally spaces), you should at least document what manual steps would be needed for a rollback.
Consider implementing a partial down migration or better documentation:
async down(queryInterface, Sequelize) {
throw new Error(
'Down migration not supported. Manual intervention required:\n' +
'1. Restore organization codes from backup\n' +
'2. Update all related tables (organization_registration_codes, user_organizations, etc.)\n' +
'3. Re-establish foreign key constraints\n' +
'Original format cannot be automatically restored as spaces were converted to underscores.'
);
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/database/migrations/20250729064710-org-code-fix.js around lines 182 to
186, the down migration is currently not implemented and only logs a warning,
which prevents rollback. Replace the console.warn with a down method that throws
an error explaining that down migration is not supported and provide detailed
instructions for manual rollback steps, including restoring from backup,
updating related tables, and re-establishing foreign key constraints.
src/validators/v1/organization.js
Outdated
| .matches(/^[a-z0-9]+$/) | ||
| .withMessage('code is invalid. Only lowercase alphanumeric characters allowed') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validation pattern doesn't allow underscores, but migration converts spaces to underscores
The regex pattern /^[a-z0-9]+$/ only allows lowercase alphanumeric characters, but the migration script converts spaces to underscores. This means organization codes like "org_name" (created by the migration from "org name") would fail validation.
Consider updating the regex to allow underscores:
- .matches(/^[a-z0-9]+$/)
+ .matches(/^[a-z0-9_]+$/)Alternatively, if underscores are not desired, the migration should remove spaces entirely or replace them with another character that's allowed by this validation.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .matches(/^[a-z0-9]+$/) | |
| .withMessage('code is invalid. Only lowercase alphanumeric characters allowed') | |
| .matches(/^[a-z0-9_]+$/) | |
| .withMessage('code is invalid. Only lowercase alphanumeric characters allowed') |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/validators/v1/organization.js around lines 19 to 20, the regex pattern
for validating organization codes only allows lowercase alphanumeric characters
and disallows underscores, but the migration script converts spaces to
underscores. To fix this, update the regex pattern to also allow underscores by
including "_" in the character set, e.g., /^[a-z0-9_]+$/. This will ensure codes
like "org_name" pass validation. Alternatively, if underscores are not desired,
modify the migration script to replace spaces with allowed characters instead.
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit