Have you ever thought to yourself, "Gee, I sure wish I could cryptographically prove in quantum-resistant zero knowledge that I computed a gigantic chain of hashes correctly"? Well good news because this repo will fill that burning hole in your heart with a plonky2-based implementation of a prover/verifier pair for a recursive computation chain that argues the computational integrity of a series of hashes a la IVC style and outputs a compressed proof of constant size. The recursive nature of this circuit gives desireable scaling characteristics, and this work presents and effort to better understand the unique design challenges presented when working with low-level circuitry.
You can download the repo and run the main branch with:
cargo test
Which is run in release mode by default. This repo requires the nightly toolchain. If you are seeing errors related to:
6 | #![feature(specialization)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be used on the stable release channel
|
7 | #![cfg_attr(target_arch = "x86_64", feature(stdarch_x86_avx512))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0554]: `#![feature]` may not be used on the stable release channel
|
7 | #![cfg_attr(target_arch = "x86_64", feature(stdarch_x86_avx512))]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Then please double check your toolchain. Otherwise, this repo should work out of the box.
You can also run:
RUSTFLAGS="-Ctarget-cpu=native" cargo run --release --example circuit_telemetry -- -vv --steps 20
To quickly benchmark prover and verifer performance, as well as examine details about the chain over a given number of steps:
[2024-08-23T08:01:38Z INFO hash_chain] Number of gates in circuit: 112960
[2024-08-23T08:01:46Z INFO hash_chain] Total Proof length: 133440 bytes
[2024-08-23T08:01:46Z INFO circuit_telemetry] Proof time: 9.733192095s
[2024-08-23T08:01:46Z INFO circuit_telemetry] Verification time: 4.142599ms
[2024-08-23T08:01:46Z INFO circuit_telemetry] Circuit depth: 20
The following hashes are available in the recursive chain:
Hasher | Validation |
---|---|
Poseidon Hash | |
Keccak |
The keccak chain fails to build successfully at current, work is ongoing to fix this eventually.
Our approach is to insert the following gates into the circuit with the requisite connections. It is not enough to create a circuit that simply connects each hash output the next input, the prover must argue the hash computation and verify the preceeding hash in a single step, taking into account the recursive structure of the chain:
+--------------------------------+ +-------------------------+ +------------------------------+
| 1. initialize_circuit_builder | | 2. setup_hashes | | 3. common_data_for_recursion |
| Set up the circuit builder |──▶| Configure initial |──▶| Set up data for recursion |
| and configuration. | | and current hash | | and verifier data inputs. |
+--------------------------------+ | targets and register | +------------------------------+
| | them as public inputs. | |
| +-------------------------+ |
│ │
│ +--------------------+ │
└──────────▶| 4. setup_condition | │
| Set condition for | │
| recursion base. | │
+--------------------+ │
│ ▼
│ +--------------------------------------+
└──────────▶| 5. setup_recursive_layers |
| Configure recursive layers |
| and integrate proof. |
+--------------------------------------+
│ ▲
│ │
│ │
▼ │
+-----------------------------+ │
| 6. process_recursive_layer |──┘
| Handle recursion, verify, |
| and loop through steps. |
+-----------------------------+
│
▼
+-------------------------+
| 7. compile_and_process |
| Finalize circuit and |
| handle processing. |
+-------------------------+
You can also view a rough sketch of a circuit diagram of the entire setup:
- Counter Initialization: A counter gate is initialized to track the depth of recursion.
- Hash Initialization: A virtual hash target gate is inserted and registered as a public input, marking the starting point of the hash chain.
- Hash Gate: An updateable hash gate is added to enable hash updates as the recursion progresses.
- Verifier Data Setup: Circuit common data is prepared, including configuration and partial witnesses required for recursion.
- Base Case Identification: A condition is set to identify whether the current computation is the base case or a recursive case.
- Hash Chain Connection: The current hash is connected to the previous hash output or set as the initial hash based on whether it's a base or recursive step.
- Circuit Building: The circuit for the current step is built.
- Proof Generation: A proof of the correctness of the current hash computation is generated using the circuit data.
- Proof Verification: The generated proof is verified to ensure that the hash was computed correctly.
- Final Hash Check: After all recursive steps, the final hash is compared against the expected result to confirm the integrity of the entire hash chain.
use hash_chain::HashChain;
use plonky2::{
field::goldilocks_field::GoldilocksField,
plonk::{
circuit_builder::CircuitBuilder,
circuit_data::CircuitConfig,
config::{GenericConfig, PoseidonGoldilocksConfig},
},
};
const D: usize = 2;
type C = PoseidonGoldilocksConfig; // A config with poseidon as the hasher for FRI
type F = <C as GenericConfig<D>>::F;
// a non-ZK config, commitments and proof may reveal input data
let config = CircuitConfig::standard_recursion_config();
let mut circuit = CircuitBuilder::<F, D>::new(config.clone());
// Prove
let (proof, circuit_data) =
<CircuitBuilder<GoldilocksField, D> as HashChain<GoldilocksField, D, C>>::build_hash_chain_circuit(
&mut circuit,
2, // number of steps in the hash chain
)
.unwrap();
// Verify
let verification_result =
<CircuitBuilder<GoldilocksField, D> as HashChain<GoldilocksField, D, C>>::verify(proof, circuit_data);
assert!(verification_result.is_ok());
We observe a total uncompressed proof size of 133440 bytes, regardless of number of steps in the chain. We find this is very nice because this number stays the same no matter how many hashes we compute. In theory, recursively verifiable proofs of this nature can compress extremely large computations into a very small space. Think fully-succinct blockchains, in which light clients can verify the entire state of the chain trustlessly by verifying a small and simple proof in trivial amounts of time.
This crate uses criterion for formal benchmarks. Bench prover and verifier performance with:
cargo bench
Here are some prelimnary performance metrics observed thus far:
Circuit depth (steps) | Prover Runtime (s) | Verifier Runtime (ms) | System RAM Used (mb) |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 3.3680 s | 3.1013 ms | 375.692 |
4 | 4.2126 s | 3.1220 ms | 381.536 |
8 | 5.7366 s | 3.0812 ms | 392.716 |
16 | 8.8146 s | 3.1098 ms | 405.516 |
32 | 14.957 s | 3.0865 ms | 417.704 |
64 | 27.294 s | 3.1625 ms | 436.424 |
This project makes use of the following open-source libraries:
Recursive STARK Wiring framework:
- plonky2 by Polygon Labs
Hash Circuits:
- plonky2_crypto by Jump Crypto
-
The always excellent Anatomy of a STARK:
- add benches
- better error handling with thiserr
- Compress the proof at the end
- support keccak
- add richer circuit telemetry