Add rule to check user, beamline and visit are compatible#212
Merged
Conversation
garryod
reviewed
Nov 20, 2024
Contributor
garryod
left a comment
garryod
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure I quite understand this one, why are we passing input.beamline is it to lock a service down to a particular beamline?
Collaborator
Author
|
It's mainly to stop i22 GDA being able to write to B21's data directory etc. When figuring out where to write data, we have a template with placeholders for instrument and visit (eg |
garryod
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.