chore: relicense Devlane under the MIT License#295
Conversation
Replace the custom Devlane Software License (which carried a non-commercial resale/hosting restriction) with the standard MIT License. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe repository now uses standard MIT License text, documents the MIT License in the README, and sets the package metadata license field to ChangesLicense Update
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@LICENSE`:
- Around line 1-3: Update the root package license metadata in package.json and
package-lock.json from ISC to MIT, ensuring package-lock.json is regenerated
from the updated package.json so both files and published artifacts consistently
reference the MIT LICENSE.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
- README license section: Devlane Software License -> MIT (OSI-approved) - package.json license: "SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE" -> "MIT" - package-lock.json license: "ISC" -> "MIT" Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 130: Update the license statement in README.md to hyphenate
“open-source,” changing the phrase to “an OSI-approved open-source license.”
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 641b1e4d-0509-4ffb-b54f-4308e510b886
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mdpackage.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.json
What
Replaces the custom Devlane Software License with the standard MIT License.
The previous license was MIT-style but added a non-commercial "Additional Use Restriction" that prohibited reselling or offering a hosted/SaaS version of the Software. This PR drops that restriction and adopts plain MIT, so Devlane is fully open source with no commercial-use limits.
Why
To make Devlane a genuinely open, permissively-licensed project that teams and contributors can use, self-host, and build on without restriction.
Change
LICENSE: custom Devlane Software License → standard MIT License (same 2026 Devlane copyright).No code changes.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit