Use more lightweight library for parsing/handling JSON data #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Keeping stleary/JSON-java#893 in mind, will update with another pr once this goes through |
|
Thanks for contributing! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As per request by a user in discord, the library currently uses fasterxml-jackson databind, which in itself is likely too large for a library with this little volume, especially when this library is required to be shaded/exported into the final jar users will export.
Replacing said jackson-core databind with a more lightweight library, org.json:
Tested locally using the already existing "LocalTesting.java", works as well as before.