Skip to content

feat: add the cppcheck runner #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Jun 13, 2023
Merged

feat: add the cppcheck runner #1

merged 23 commits into from
Jun 13, 2023

Conversation

swarnim-deepsource
Copy link
Contributor

@swarnim-deepsource swarnim-deepsource commented May 2, 2023

Task:

  • Add the rust code for the cppcheck deepsource runner.
  • Add the docker file.
  • Update readme and automate pipeline for image upload.

Fixes lae-7799

@swarnim-deepsource swarnim-deepsource force-pushed the init-cppcheck branch 2 times, most recently from 972d509 to add9024 Compare May 2, 2023 12:27
just the rust code for the cppcheck deepsource runner
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented May 4, 2023

LAE-7799 Create a new Repository: cppchk-rs / deepsource_cppcheck

This card should be moved to done only when the things below are checked off.

This is the repo for cppcheck integration's open source components, the dockerimage and the rust runner code.

we can poll over the name but I vote for cppchk-rs

Checklist:

  • Add a description
  • Set up branch protection rules
  • Enable DeepSource Secrets Analyzer along with the Analyzers that are applicable for the Repo
  • Add a README
    • Mention short description, dev/local setup, conventions used
    • Add DeepSource badges
  • Set up barebones of the CI
  • Set up Makefile
  • Add OWNERS file
    • Mention approvers
    • Mention reviewers

update libs to latests & support multiple destinations for prod build
@deepak-deepsource deepak-deepsource merged commit a4198fb into master Jun 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants