feat(rc): add overrides for RC config/director roots by bwoebi · Pull Request #2404 · DataDog/libdatadog

bwoebi · 2026-08-24T17:30:00Z

This is needed for usage in system-tests.

datadog-datadog-us1-prod

More details

The new root overrides reach the correct director and config TUF clients. Existing callers still use the site-based roots when no override is set.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 72d2664 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

pr-commenter · 2026-08-24T17:42:01Z

Benchmarks

Comparison

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-24 21:02:30

Comparing candidate commit ea6c52f in PR branch bob/rc-override with baseline commit 4d96edb in branch main.

Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 12 metrics, 1 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:single_flag_killswitch/rules-based

🟩 execution_time [-10.134ns; -8.963ns] or [-5.975%; -5.285%]

Candidate

Candidate benchmark details

Group 1

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`ea6c52f`	1787604725	bob/rc-override

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
sdk_test_data/rules-based	execution_time	142.122µs	145.790µs ± 5.635µs	144.584µs ± 0.708µs	145.618µs	150.527µs	167.453µs	204.861µs	41.69%	7.254	64.853	3.86%	0.398µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
sdk_test_data/rules-based	execution_time	[145.009µs; 146.571µs] or [-0.536%; +0.536%]	None	None	None

Group 2

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`ea6c52f`	1787604725	bob/rc-override

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
single_flag_killswitch/rules-based	execution_time	156.504ns	160.046ns ± 2.600ns	159.464ns ± 1.383ns	161.218ns	164.830ns	167.991ns	172.867ns	8.40%	1.418	3.050	1.62%	0.184ns	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
single_flag_killswitch/rules-based	execution_time	[159.686ns; 160.407ns] or [-0.225%; +0.225%]	None	None	None

Group 3

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`ea6c52f`	1787604725	bob/rc-override

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	execution_time	21.897ms	22.008ms ± 0.071ms	21.994ms ± 0.036ms	22.033ms	22.148ms	22.246ms	22.257ms	1.20%	1.399	2.313	0.32%	0.005ms	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	throughput	112324.432op/s	113594.091op/s ± 363.938op/s	113669.503op/s ± 186.400op/s	113830.324op/s	114051.068op/s	114147.693op/s	114171.206op/s	0.44%	-1.377	2.242	0.32%	25.734op/s	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	execution_time	102.501ms	103.030ms ± 0.385ms	102.994ms ± 0.273ms	103.271ms	103.552ms	103.602ms	106.216ms	3.13%	2.881	21.518	0.37%	0.027ms	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	throughput	9414.774op/s	9706.001op/s ± 35.880op/s	9709.339op/s ± 25.849op/s	9735.061op/s	9747.792op/s	9751.559op/s	9755.990op/s	0.48%	-2.716	19.759	0.37%	2.537op/s	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	execution_time	597.078µs	599.375µs ± 0.803µs	599.317µs ± 0.487µs	599.781µs	600.864µs	601.552µs	603.493µs	0.70%	0.968	3.068	0.13%	0.057µs	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	throughput	165702.139op/s	166840.870op/s ± 223.145op/s	166856.602op/s ± 135.602op/s	166997.832op/s	167119.311op/s	167267.632op/s	167482.353op/s	0.38%	-0.951	3.000	0.13%	15.779op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	execution_time	[21.999ms; 22.018ms] or [-0.045%; +0.045%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	throughput	[113543.652op/s; 113644.529op/s] or [-0.044%; +0.044%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	execution_time	[102.977ms; 103.084ms] or [-0.052%; +0.052%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	throughput	[9701.028op/s; 9710.973op/s] or [-0.051%; +0.051%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	execution_time	[599.263µs; 599.486µs] or [-0.019%; +0.019%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	throughput	[166809.944op/s; 166871.796op/s] or [-0.019%; +0.019%]	None	None	None

Group 4

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`ea6c52f`	1787604725	bob/rc-override

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	execution_time	5.344ms	5.362ms ± 0.007ms	5.361ms ± 0.005ms	5.366ms	5.373ms	5.379ms	5.385ms	0.43%	0.100	0.111	0.13%	0.001ms	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	throughput	464271.047op/s	466279.232op/s ± 619.948op/s	466287.876op/s ± 406.865op/s	466678.578op/s	467309.674op/s	467667.982op/s	467848.996op/s	0.33%	-0.092	0.104	0.13%	43.837op/s	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	execution_time	7.932ms	7.946ms ± 0.007ms	7.946ms ± 0.004ms	7.950ms	7.955ms	7.973ms	7.979ms	0.41%	1.445	5.816	0.08%	0.000ms	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	throughput	125335.382op/s	125842.414op/s ± 103.542op/s	125847.304op/s ± 56.670op/s	125901.627op/s	125995.575op/s	126047.690op/s	126076.282op/s	0.18%	-1.431	5.751	0.08%	7.322op/s	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	execution_time	178.474µs	186.153µs ± 66.789µs	181.453µs ± 0.205µs	181.654µs	182.050µs	182.723µs	1125.929µs	520.51%	14.034	194.973	35.79%	4.723µs	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	throughput	88815.508op/s	548868.463op/s ± 32744.158op/s	551107.326op/s ± 622.533op/s	551728.805op/s	553127.821op/s	557122.318op/s	560307.273op/s	1.67%	-13.971	193.798	5.95%	2315.362op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	execution_time	[5.361ms; 5.363ms] or [-0.018%; +0.018%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	throughput	[466193.313op/s; 466365.151op/s] or [-0.018%; +0.018%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	execution_time	[7.946ms; 7.947ms] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	throughput	[125828.064op/s; 125856.764op/s] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	execution_time	[176.897µs; 195.410µs] or [-4.972%; +4.972%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	throughput	[544330.438op/s; 553406.488op/s] or [-0.827%; +0.827%]	None	None	None

Baseline

Baseline benchmark details

Group 1

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`4d96edb`	1787603238	main

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
sdk_test_data/rules-based	execution_time	142.993µs	146.310µs ± 6.000µs	144.967µs ± 0.738µs	146.030µs	152.216µs	168.981µs	210.031µs	44.88%	7.450	68.035	4.09%	0.424µs	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
sdk_test_data/rules-based	execution_time	[145.479µs; 147.142µs] or [-0.568%; +0.568%]	None	None	None

Group 2

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`4d96edb`	1787603238	main

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
single_flag_killswitch/rules-based	execution_time	164.703ns	169.595ns ± 3.328ns	168.985ns ± 2.150ns	171.421ns	175.680ns	179.520ns	183.929ns	8.84%	1.090	1.545	1.96%	0.235ns	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
single_flag_killswitch/rules-based	execution_time	[169.133ns; 170.056ns] or [-0.272%; +0.272%]	None	None	None

Group 3

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`4d96edb`	1787603238	main

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	execution_time	21.881ms	21.995ms ± 0.056ms	21.993ms ± 0.033ms	22.024ms	22.097ms	22.125ms	22.140ms	0.67%	0.327	-0.272	0.25%	0.004ms	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	throughput	112918.867op/s	113661.867op/s ± 287.261op/s	113671.208op/s ± 172.383op/s	113853.762op/s	114118.283op/s	114186.139op/s	114252.917op/s	0.51%	-0.315	-0.282	0.25%	20.312op/s	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	execution_time	102.474ms	103.172ms ± 0.431ms	103.067ms ± 0.183ms	103.325ms	103.912ms	104.118ms	106.173ms	3.01%	2.098	10.466	0.42%	0.030ms	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	throughput	9418.583op/s	9692.756op/s ± 40.165op/s	9702.419op/s ± 17.224op/s	9715.584op/s	9741.758op/s	9755.168op/s	9758.561op/s	0.58%	-2.000	9.605	0.41%	2.840op/s	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	execution_time	596.667µs	598.006µs ± 0.582µs	597.981µs ± 0.337µs	598.330µs	598.999µs	599.942µs	600.366µs	0.40%	0.663	1.844	0.10%	0.041µs	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	throughput	166565.136op/s	167222.489op/s ± 162.702op/s	167229.492op/s ± 94.222op/s	167314.685op/s	167475.742op/s	167577.008op/s	167597.583op/s	0.22%	-0.653	1.818	0.10%	11.505op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	execution_time	[21.987ms; 22.003ms] or [-0.035%; +0.035%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	throughput	[113622.055op/s; 113701.678op/s] or [-0.035%; +0.035%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	execution_time	[103.112ms; 103.231ms] or [-0.058%; +0.058%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	throughput	[9687.189op/s; 9698.322op/s] or [-0.057%; +0.057%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	execution_time	[597.926µs; 598.087µs] or [-0.013%; +0.013%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/payloads/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	throughput	[167199.940op/s; 167245.038op/s] or [-0.013%; +0.013%]	None	None	None

Group 4

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`4d96edb`	1787603238	main

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	execution_time	5.323ms	5.346ms ± 0.008ms	5.344ms ± 0.005ms	5.351ms	5.360ms	5.363ms	5.369ms	0.46%	0.300	-0.033	0.15%	0.001ms	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	throughput	465632.980op/s	467679.867op/s ± 685.852op/s	467794.457op/s ± 436.933op/s	468169.227op/s	468669.636op/s	469178.991op/s	469628.293op/s	0.39%	-0.292	-0.036	0.15%	48.497op/s	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	execution_time	7.919ms	7.932ms ± 0.006ms	7.932ms ± 0.003ms	7.935ms	7.942ms	7.949ms	7.973ms	0.52%	1.929	10.162	0.08%	0.000ms	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	throughput	125419.455op/s	126068.806op/s ± 99.407op/s	126076.533op/s ± 46.261op/s	126121.211op/s	126223.268op/s	126264.776op/s	126283.987op/s	0.16%	-1.910	10.023	0.08%	7.029op/s	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	execution_time	178.945µs	181.387µs ± 0.550µs	181.285µs ± 0.195µs	181.539µs	182.322µs	182.742µs	184.173µs	1.59%	0.272	7.243	0.30%	0.039µs	1	200
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	throughput	542969.227op/s	551312.910op/s ± 1670.863op/s	551617.833op/s ± 594.472op/s	552130.952op/s	552654.350op/s	558134.668op/s	558830.926op/s	1.31%	-0.189	7.283	0.30%	118.148op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	execution_time	[5.344ms; 5.347ms] or [-0.020%; +0.020%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/scale/2500flags_500users_20fields	throughput	[467584.814op/s; 467774.919op/s] or [-0.020%; +0.020%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	execution_time	[7.931ms; 7.933ms] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/stress/10flags_1000users_250fields	throughput	[126055.029op/s; 126082.583op/s] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	execution_time	[181.311µs; 181.463µs] or [-0.042%; +0.042%]	None	None	None
flagevaluation_evp/coalescer/typical/100flags_50users_10fields	throughput	[551081.344op/s; 551544.475op/s] or [-0.042%; +0.042%]	None	None	None

datadog-datadog-us1-prod · 2026-08-24T17:42:28Z

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 41.67%
• Overall Coverage: 76.61% (-0.02%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: ea6c52f | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!}

dd-octo-sts · 2026-08-24T18:06:24Z

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	8.26 MB	8.26 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	89.52 MB	89.52 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	11.06 MB	11.06 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	100.70 MB	100.70 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

libdatadog-x64-windows

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	26.64 MB	26.64 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	94.96 KB	94.96 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	180.73 MB	180.73 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	772.85 MB	772.85 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	8.73 MB	8.73 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	94.96 KB	94.96 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	25.65 MB	25.65 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	51.09 MB	51.09 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

libdatadog-x86-windows

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	23.22 MB	23.22 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	96.45 KB	96.45 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	185.67 MB	185.66 MB	-0% (-8.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	759.09 MB	759.09 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	6.74 MB	6.74 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	96.45 KB	96.45 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	27.59 MB	27.59 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	48.62 MB	48.62 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

x86_64-alpine-linux-musl

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	79.78 MB	79.78 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	9.16 MB	9.16 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	95.42 MB	95.42 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	11.17 MB	11.17 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

bwoebi · 2026-08-24T18:26:15Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-08-24T18:26:20Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-24 18:26:19 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-08-24 18:26:25 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 60m (p90).

2026-08-24 19:11:09 UTC ❌ MergeQueue: The checks failed on this merge request

Tests failed on this commit c364635:

What to do next?

Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
If your PR checks are green, try to rebase/merge. It might be because the CI run is a bit old.
Any question, go check the FAQ.

bwoebi · 2026-08-24T19:26:44Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-08-24T19:26:48Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-24 19:26:48 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-08-24 19:26:53 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
Run /remove to cancel it.

2026-08-24 20:03:12 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 60m (p90).

2026-08-24 20:03:32 UTC ❌ MergeQueue: This merge request has conflicts

This merge request conflicts with another merge request ahead in the queue.

The merge requests in front of this one are:

#2399 with merge sha 07361e8

datadog-datadog-us1-prod

More details

The trust-root overrides reach the matching TUF clients. Existing site-based roots remain the default.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 61d060a · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

bwoebi · 2026-08-24T19:58:33Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-08-24T19:58:38Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-24 19:58:37 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-08-24 19:58:39 UTC ❌ MergeQueue

PR already in the queue with status waiting

This is needed for usage in system-tests.

bwoebi · 2026-08-24T20:54:52Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-08-24T20:54:57Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-24 20:54:57 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-08-24 20:55:03 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
Run /remove to cancel it.

2026-08-24 21:24:13 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 60m (p90).

2026-08-24 21:59:47 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

…ker, libdd-data-pipeline, li... (#2409) # Release proposal for libdd-capabilities-impl, libdd-crashtracker, libdd-data-pipeline, libdd-http-client, libdd-ipc, libdd-library-config, libdd-otel-thread-ctx, libdd-remote-config, libdd-shared-runtime, libdd-telemetry, libdd-tracer-flare and their dependencies This PR contains version bumps based on public API changes and commits since last release. ## libdd-gotter **Next version:** `1.1.0` **Semver bump:** `minor` **Tag:** `libdd-gotter-v1.1.0` ### Commits - fix(crashtracker): fix vdso recognition during GOT patching on musl (#2379) ## libdd-ipc-macros **Next version:** `1.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-ipc-macros-v1.0.0` **Warning:** this is an initial release. Please verify that the version and commits included are correct. ## libdd-trace-protobuf **Next version:** `5.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-trace-protobuf-v5.0.0` ### Commits - chore(trace-protobuf)!: sync span.proto with datadog-agent (#2356) ## libdd-library-config **Next version:** `4.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-library-config-v4.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-trace-protobuf`: ^4.0.0 → ^5.0.0 ### Commits - fix(library-config): omit absent process context attributes (#2337) - refactor: migrate to workspace dependencies, phase 4 (#2296) - refactor: migrate to workspace dependencies, phase 3 (#2283) - refactor: consolidate core dependencies at workspace level (phase 1) (#2253) - fix(library-config): update Linux process context (#2237) - refactor(library-config): reorganize Linux process context (#2228) - feat(library-config): otel process context reader (#2176) ## libdd-remote-config **Next version:** `4.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-remote-config-v4.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-trace-protobuf`: ^4.0.1 → ^5.0.0 ### Commits - feat(rc): add overrides for RC config/director roots (#2404) - fix(rc): avoid depending on the crypto nodejs API for remote config (#2407) - fix(rc)!: fixup rc to be wasm compatible (#2393) - feat: Revert vendoring of tuf-rust (#2365), use new crates.io package (#2374) - feat(agentless)!: vendor rust-tuf crate in libdatadog for release (#2365) - chore(rc)!: add DEBUG product (#2306) - feat(remote-config)!: agentless RC fetcher (#2112) ## libdd-trace-utils **Next version:** `11.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-trace-utils-v11.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-trace-protobuf`: ^4.0.1 → ^5.0.0 ### Commits - feat(compression): use zrip for wasm targets (#2386) - fix(trace-utils)!: fix forward compatibility for string streaming (#2295) ## libdd-tracer-flare **Next version:** `2.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-tracer-flare-v2.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-remote-config`: ^3.0.0 → ^4.0.0 - `libdd-trace-utils`: ^10.0.0 → ^11.0.0 ### Commits - feat(remote-config)!: agentless RC fetcher (#2112) ## libdd-crashtracker **Next version:** `2.0.1` **Semver bump:** `patch` **Tag:** `libdd-crashtracker-v2.0.1` ### Commits - fix(crashtracker): hold the collector connection open through symbolization (#2384) - fix(crashtracking): stop resolving thread symbols with libunwind in the receiver (#2361) ## libdd-data-pipeline **Next version:** `9.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-data-pipeline-v9.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-trace-protobuf`: ^4.0.1 → ^5.0.0 - `libdd-trace-utils`: ^10.1.0 → ^11.0.0 ### Commits - feat(compression): use zrip for wasm targets (#2386) ## libdd-ipc **Next version:** `1.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-ipc-v1.0.0` **Warning:** this is an initial release. Please verify that the version and commits included are correct. ## libdd-trace-normalization **Next version:** `4.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-trace-normalization-v4.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-trace-protobuf`: ^4.0.1 → ^5.0.0 ## libdd-trace-obfuscation **Next version:** `7.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-trace-obfuscation-v7.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-trace-protobuf`: ^4.0.1 → ^5.0.0 - `libdd-trace-utils`: ^10.1.0 → ^11.0.0 ## libdd-trace-stats **Next version:** `8.0.0` **Semver bump:** `major` **Tag:** `libdd-trace-stats-v8.0.0` ### ⚠️ major bump forced due to: - `libdd-trace-protobuf`: ^4.0.1 → ^5.0.0 - `libdd-trace-utils`: ^10.1.0 → ^11.0.0 --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: hoolioh <107922352+hoolioh@users.noreply.github.com>

bwoebi requested review from a team as code owners August 24, 2026 17:30

bwoebi changed the title ~~Add overrides for RC config/director roots~~ feat(rc): add overrides for RC config/director roots Aug 24, 2026

datadog-datadog-us1-prod Bot reviewed Aug 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

paullegranddc approved these changes Aug 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress mergequeue-status: rejected and removed mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress labels Aug 24, 2026

bwoebi requested a review from a team as a code owner August 24, 2026 19:26

github-actions Bot added the ci-build label Aug 24, 2026

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added mergequeue-status: waiting and removed mergequeue-status: rejected labels Aug 24, 2026

datadog-datadog-us1-prod Bot reviewed Aug 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress and removed mergequeue-status: waiting mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress labels Aug 24, 2026

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added the mergequeue-status: rejected label Aug 24, 2026

Add overrides for RC config/director roots

ea6c52f

This is needed for usage in system-tests.

bwoebi force-pushed the bob/rc-override branch from 61d060a to ea6c52f Compare August 24, 2026 20:52

github-actions Bot removed the ci-build label Aug 24, 2026

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added mergequeue-status: waiting mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress and removed mergequeue-status: rejected mergequeue-status: waiting mergequeue-status: queued labels Aug 24, 2026

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 966f921 into main Aug 24, 2026
119 of 123 checks passed

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the bob/rc-override branch August 24, 2026 21:59

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added mergequeue-status: done and removed mergequeue-status: in_progress labels Aug 24, 2026

dd-octo-sts Bot mentioned this pull request Aug 25, 2026

chore(release): proposal for libdd-capabilities-impl, libdd-crashtracker, libdd-data-pipeline, li... #2409

Merged

webern mentioned this pull request Sep 14, 2026

Obfuscation: a [ or ] in a URL path or fragment makes obfuscate_url_string return ? #2523

Closed

Conversation

bwoebi commented Aug 24, 2026

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-us1-prod Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Comparison

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

scenario:single_flag_killswitch/rules-based

Candidate

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Baseline

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-us1-prod Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 • edited by datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

Uh oh!

bwoebi commented Aug 24, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What to do next?

Uh oh!

bwoebi commented Aug 24, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-us1-prod Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

bwoebi commented Aug 24, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bwoebi commented Aug 24, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-datadog-us1-prod Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 •

edited by datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading