Skip to content

Proposal: Expose poll style API for DmaFile #445

Open

Description

This proposes to add some interfaces for DmaFile (and maybe other necessary structures later).

DmaFile's read/write implementations use Source::collect_rw() which relies on poll_fn to convert a poll-based workflow into async fn. IMHO It would also be natural to expose those poll-based APIs alone with async version. This brings a bit more flexibility by providing another way to use DmaFile under the async environment. Otherwise, we need to do a lot of (bad) workarounds to "poll" those read/write tasks.

Please let me know your opinion!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions