Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PROF-10198] Add benchmark config with allocation profiling + ddprof #3794

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

ivoanjo
Copy link
Member

@ivoanjo ivoanjo commented Jul 18, 2024

What does this PR do?

This PR adds a new benchmarking configuration for testing allocation profiling with ddprof enabled.

(As a reminder, ddprof is the Datadog native profiler).

Motivation:

The intention is to allow us to use ddprof to profile the Ruby profiler, so we can identify optimization opportunities and validate any changes we make.

Additional Notes:

N/A

How to test the change?

I've tried to test this PR locally using the bp-runner tool, but for some reason I get benchmark results, but no profiles. Nevertheless, this change is harmless so I'm thinking of merging this in and seeing if it shows up correctly on the next nightly run.

**What does this PR do?**

This PR adds a new benchmarking configuration for testing allocation
profiling with `ddprof` enabled.

(As a reminder, `ddprof` is the Datadog native profiler).

**Motivation:**

The intention is to allow us to use ddprof to profile the Ruby profiler,
so we can identify optimization opportunities and validate any changes
we make.

**Additional Notes:**

N/A

**How to test the change?**

I've tested this PR locally using the `bp-runner` tool.
@ivoanjo ivoanjo requested a review from a team as a code owner July 18, 2024 16:10
@ivoanjo ivoanjo merged commit 40d80cd into master Jul 22, 2024
170 of 171 checks passed
@ivoanjo ivoanjo deleted the ivoanjo/enable-ddprof-benchmark-platform branch July 22, 2024 07:53
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2.3.0 milestone Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants