Skip to content

chore(litellm): add litellm files to codeowners #13656

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2025

Conversation

ncybul
Copy link
Contributor

@ncybul ncybul commented Jun 12, 2025

This PR adds litellm files to the codeowners.

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

@ncybul ncybul added the changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. label Jun 12, 2025
@ncybul ncybul marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2025 13:28
@ncybul ncybul requested review from a team as code owners June 12, 2025 13:28
Copy link
Contributor

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

.github/CODEOWNERS                                                      @DataDog/python-guild @DataDog/apm-core-python

Copy link
Member

@brettlangdon brettlangdon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥

@brettlangdon brettlangdon enabled auto-merge (squash) June 12, 2025 13:31
Copy link
Contributor

Bootstrap import analysis

Comparison of import times between this PR and base.

Summary

The average import time from this PR is: 275 ± 2 ms.

The average import time from base is: 275 ± 2 ms.

The import time difference between this PR and base is: -0.81 ± 0.07 ms.

Import time breakdown

The following import paths have shrunk:

ddtrace.auto 1.920 ms (0.70%)
ddtrace.bootstrap.sitecustomize 1.249 ms (0.45%)
ddtrace.bootstrap.preload 1.249 ms (0.45%)
ddtrace.internal.remoteconfig.client 0.609 ms (0.22%)
ddtrace 0.671 ms (0.24%)
ddtrace.internal._unpatched 0.027 ms (0.01%)
json 0.027 ms (0.01%)
json.decoder 0.027 ms (0.01%)
re 0.027 ms (0.01%)
enum 0.027 ms (0.01%)
types 0.027 ms (0.01%)

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-06-12 14:21:03

Comparing candidate commit 70bce5e in PR branch nicole-cybul/add-litellm-to-codeowners with baseline commit fd2bcdf in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 465 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

scenario:iastaspectssplit-splitlines_aspect

  • 🟥 execution_time [+103.695ns; +143.286ns] or [+7.101%; +9.813%]

@brettlangdon brettlangdon merged commit b588b17 into main Jun 12, 2025
407 of 413 checks passed
@brettlangdon brettlangdon deleted the nicole-cybul/add-litellm-to-codeowners branch June 12, 2025 20:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants