[DBM] Add Oracle stored-procedure service comments

[na-ji]

Summary of changes

Allow Oracle CommandType.StoredProcedure invocations to receive existing DBM service comments in service mode and its dynamic_service alias.

Reason for change

DBM/APM service mode was never fully implemented for the ODP.net integration. Multiple paying customers recently asked for this support.

Implementation details

• Reuse the existing comment builder and deduplication; enable the Oracle stored-procedure gate only at service propagation level.
• Preserve command type, procedure name, parameters, binding mode, transactions, outputs, function returns, and reader behavior.

Other details

Companion demo and results: https://github.com/DataDog/dbm/pull/620

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-15T07:17:57.498342Z	a33aa6a	PR opened
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-15T07:19:38.075087Z	a33aa6a	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[datadog-datadog-us1-prod]

More details

Oracle stored-procedure comments are limited to service and dynamic_service modes while preserving existing SQL Server gating and comment deduplication. The completed static review returned no reportable findings.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit a33aa6a}

[dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot]

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9415) and master.

✅ No regressions detected

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-10-15 08:29:59

Comparing candidate commit a33aa6a in PR branch naji.astier/oracle-stored-procedure-service-comments with baseline commit 2cc8452 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 11 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 61 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 75 known flaky benchmarks, 51 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+10.133%; +10.144%]
• 🟥 throughput [-21145.385op/s; -18290.717op/s] or [-5.956%; -5.152%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+9.750%; +9.761%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark.ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+9.830%; +9.841%]
• 🟥 throughput [-36672.345op/s; -28700.828op/s] or [-9.064%; -7.094%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+272 bytes; +273 bytes] or [+9.374%; +9.385%]
• 🟥 throughput [-10810.222op/s; -10592.474op/s] or [-12.341%; -12.092%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+199 bytes; +200 bytes] or [+9.426%; +9.438%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+199 bytes; +200 bytes] or [+7.569%; +7.581%]
• 🟥 throughput [-13488.613op/s; -11944.833op/s] or [-10.704%; -9.479%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 throughput [-10006.969op/s; -9167.730op/s] or [-7.666%; -7.023%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0

• 🟥 throughput [-14429.789op/s; -11586.093op/s] or [-6.870%; -5.516%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

• 🟥 throughput [-8434.109op/s; -7920.367op/s] or [-10.000%; -9.391%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 throughput [-13908.809op/s; -12197.189op/s] or [-14.142%; -12.402%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.605KB; +1.605KB] or [+48.760%; +48.776%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+302.169ms; +304.429ms] or [+149.947%; +151.069%]
• 🟥 throughput [-50.646op/s; -46.686op/s] or [-9.112%; -8.400%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.012KB; +1.012KB] or [+37.524%; +37.537%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+374.929ms; +376.561ms] or [+296.217%; +297.506%]
• 🟩 throughput [+68.370op/s; +71.090op/s] or [+9.014%; +9.373%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.088KB; +1.088KB] or [+40.343%; +40.355%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+390.834ms; +395.439ms] or [+345.873%; +349.949%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.758KB; +4.758KB] or [+100.159%; +100.174%]
• 🟥 throughput [-64260.773op/s; -63824.327op/s] or [-49.998%; -49.659%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.880KB; +3.880KB] or [+82.058%; +82.072%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-16.068ms; -11.906ms] or [-7.504%; -5.561%]
• 🟥 throughput [-61724.908op/s; -58950.380op/s] or [-45.056%; -43.030%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.608KB; +4.608KB] or [+99.641%; +99.654%]
• 🟥 throughput [-50102.316op/s; -47663.829op/s] or [-45.298%; -43.094%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.380KB; +1.380KB] or [+111.648%; +111.662%]
• 🟥 throughput [-353226.662op/s; -347041.869op/s] or [-36.066%; -35.435%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+543 bytes; +544 bytes] or [+44.437%; +44.446%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-26.097ms; -21.213ms] or [-11.638%; -9.460%]
• 🟥 throughput [-108286.348op/s; -85524.766op/s] or [-11.568%; -9.137%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.344KB; +1.344KB] or [+111.253%; +111.267%]
• 🟥 throughput [-186926.911op/s; -170461.162op/s] or [-26.858%; -24.492%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
• 🟥 throughput [-77969.214op/s; -77203.672op/s] or [-52.472%; -51.957%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
• 🟥 throughput [-75368.845op/s; -72490.724op/s] or [-47.956%; -46.125%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
• 🟥 throughput [-56357.143op/s; -53742.182op/s] or [-44.896%; -42.813%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472

• 🟥 throughput [-294507.194op/s; -271931.798op/s] or [-8.959%; -8.273%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+243969.824op/s; +278092.054op/s] or [+8.135%; +9.273%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-18.859ms; -14.512ms] or [-8.693%; -6.689%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.757KB] or [-42.326%; -42.318%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+300.012ms; +300.759ms] or [+149.906%; +150.279%]
• 🟩 throughput [+887.052op/s; +913.972op/s] or [+9.797%; +10.095%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+299.481ms; +302.572ms] or [+151.029%; +152.588%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2201.676op/s; +2411.306op/s] or [+16.840%; +18.443%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+300.805ms; +303.226ms] or [+151.522%; +152.742%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1827.744op/s; +1955.045op/s] or [+17.646%; +18.875%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+295.021ms; +295.808ms] or [+144.903%; +145.289%]
• 🟩 throughput [+571.268op/s; +580.087op/s] or [+15.145%; +15.378%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+298.556ms; +300.143ms] or [+145.953%; +146.729%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2607.730op/s; +2676.954op/s] or [+37.885%; +38.891%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+301.782ms; +303.242ms] or [+150.830%; +151.560%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1369.143op/s; +1391.040op/s] or [+27.176%; +27.611%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

• 🟩 execution_time [-146.049µs; -142.263µs] or [-29.986%; -29.208%]
• 🟩 throughput [+851.489op/s; +875.639op/s] or [+41.471%; +42.648%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-137.745µs; -111.126µs] or [-31.592%; -25.487%]
• 🟩 throughput [+849.166op/s; +970.468op/s] or [+36.918%; +42.192%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-143.557µs; -121.571µs] or [-30.758%; -26.047%]
• 🟩 throughput [+785.242op/s; +867.914op/s] or [+36.248%; +40.065%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

• 🟩 execution_time [-126.125µs; -122.263µs] or [-34.053%; -33.010%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1342.686op/s; +1382.651op/s] or [+49.727%; +51.207%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-101.606µs; -78.037µs] or [-32.438%; -24.913%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1168.577op/s; +1369.072op/s] or [+36.428%; +42.678%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 execution_time [-139.375µs; -117.029µs] or [-38.127%; -32.015%]
• 🟩 throughput [+1359.577op/s; +1494.510op/s] or [+48.790%; +53.632%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.758ms; +300.372ms] or [+149.610%; +149.916%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+424.144ms; +434.137ms] or [+460.850%; +471.708%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [+259.738ms; +316.315ms] or [+197.217%; +240.175%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

• unstable execution_time [+335.645ms; +389.276ms] or [+154.326%; +178.985%]
• 🟥 throughput [-540.559op/s; -493.187op/s] or [-48.980%; -44.688%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+208.217ms; +341.437ms] or [+88.733%; +145.506%]
• 🟥 throughput [-674.342op/s; -590.603op/s] or [-44.979%; -39.393%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+2.191KB; +2.195KB] or [+5.175%; +5.183%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+328.588ms; +338.224ms] or [+196.534%; +202.297%]
• 🟥 throughput [-392.504op/s; -355.972op/s] or [-27.330%; -24.786%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

• 🟩 execution_time [-182.271µs; -149.311µs] or [-9.233%; -7.564%]
• 🟩 throughput [+42.110op/s; +51.908op/s] or [+8.313%; +10.247%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+96 bytes; +97 bytes] or [+12.092%; +12.103%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+301.433ms; +303.526ms] or [+151.796%; +152.850%]
• 🟥 throughput [-23554.104op/s; -21416.082op/s] or [-7.579%; -6.891%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+12.114%; +12.124%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+296.496ms; +299.941ms] or [+148.575%; +150.301%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+12.114%; +12.124%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+301.313ms; +304.394ms] or [+151.367%; +152.915%]
• 🟥 throughput [-33421.302op/s; -25930.154op/s] or [-7.040%; -5.462%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+11.165%; +11.177%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+302.627ms; +304.421ms] or [+151.969%; +152.870%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+12.493%; +12.506%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+296.674ms; +298.830ms] or [+146.692%; +147.758%]
• 🟥 throughput [-61175.782op/s; -56423.811op/s] or [-9.857%; -9.091%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+11.422%; +11.434%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+302.945ms; +306.575ms] or [+153.546%; +155.386%]
• 🟥 throughput [-34095.586op/s; -26047.833op/s] or [-7.363%; -5.625%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+96 bytes; +97 bytes] or [+11.197%; +11.208%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+302.230ms; +304.464ms] or [+151.692%; +152.813%]
• 🟥 throughput [-28835.173op/s; -26351.326op/s] or [-7.481%; -6.836%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+10.618%; +10.631%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+301.430ms; +303.063ms] or [+150.235%; +151.049%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+10.618%; +10.631%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+301.222ms; +304.401ms] or [+149.855%; +151.437%]
• 🟥 throughput [-30970.021op/s; -26176.307op/s] or [-7.331%; -6.196%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+96 bytes; +97 bytes] or [+6.002%; +6.011%]
• 🟥 throughput [-15429.146op/s; -14357.360op/s] or [-6.204%; -5.773%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+5.627%; +5.636%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-17.296ms; -13.640ms] or [-8.043%; -6.343%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+5.605%; +5.617%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

• unstable execution_time [-2.247µs; +43.570µs] or [-0.555%; +10.762%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.123KB; -19.100KB] or [-6.976%; -6.967%]
• unstable execution_time [-58.482µs; -2.528µs] or [-11.559%; -0.500%]
• unstable throughput [+22.606op/s; +223.211op/s] or [+1.128%; +11.138%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• 🟩 allocated_mem [-15.370KB; -15.350KB] or [-5.603%; -5.596%]
• 🟩 execution_time [-98.497µs; -42.424µs] or [-17.069%; -7.352%]
• 🟩 throughput [+156.091op/s; +311.698op/s] or [+8.918%; +17.808%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+3.173µs; +6.618µs] or [+7.500%; +15.642%]
• 🟥 throughput [-3383.740op/s; -1721.941op/s] or [-14.244%; -7.249%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

• unstable execution_time [-17.581µs; -11.029µs] or [-27.276%; -17.111%]
• 🟩 throughput [+2997.435op/s; +4356.445op/s] or [+18.390%; +26.728%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.526ms; +303.972ms] or [+152.914%; +153.644%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 execution_time [+302.571ms; +304.936ms] or [+154.008%; +155.211%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.764ms; +302.413ms] or [+150.069%; +151.395%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+9.197%; +9.208%]
• 🟥 throughput [-38721.719op/s; -37703.774op/s] or [-10.719%; -10.437%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+9.226%; +9.238%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+9.226%; +9.238%]
• 🟥 throughput [-31481.451op/s; -22997.693op/s] or [-7.451%; -5.443%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+300.533ms; +302.412ms] or [+149.788%; +150.725%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+96 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+6.000%; +6.010%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+301.464ms; +303.375ms] or [+151.381%; +152.341%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+5.819%; +5.828%]
• 🟥 execution_time [+301.930ms; +304.225ms] or [+153.119%; +154.283%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.816ms; +300.560ms] or [+149.550%; +149.921%]
• 🟩 throughput [+61341196.263op/s; +61581342.106op/s] or [+44.672%; +44.847%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

• unstable execution_time [+339.094ms; +402.022ms] or [+421.724%; +499.985%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 execution_time [+299.342ms; +300.281ms] or [+149.305%; +149.773%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+31 bytes; +32 bytes] or [+5.244%; +5.256%]
• 🟥 throughput [-95492.599op/s; -92376.514op/s] or [-10.657%; -10.309%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

• 🟩 throughput [+55160.169op/s; +61291.679op/s] or [+5.150%; +5.723%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+31 bytes; +32 bytes] or [+6.037%; +6.047%]
• 🟥 throughput [-162610.350op/s; -159149.204op/s] or [-14.885%; -14.568%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+31 bytes; +32 bytes] or [+6.057%; +6.065%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+31 bytes; +32 bytes] or [+6.059%; +6.069%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472

• 🟥 throughput [-34631.200op/s; -31589.225op/s] or [-7.716%; -7.038%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+15.733%; +15.745%]
• 🟥 throughput [-59002.284op/s; -55549.259op/s] or [-8.635%; -8.130%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+14.810%; +14.823%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

• 🟥 allocated_mem [+95 bytes; +96 bytes] or [+14.810%; +14.821%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0
• scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1

[tabgok]

Approved from IDM's standpoint - please attain approval from at least one other language team as well