Skip to content

Add built-in vertical-only DPA profile - #57917

Draft
TitouanGuesdon wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
titouan.guesdon/vertical-only-profile
Draft

TitouanGuesdon wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
titouan.guesdon/vertical-only-profile

Conversation

@TitouanGuesdon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add a new "datadog-vertical-only" built-in cluster profile that creates DPAs with only vertical scaling enabled (resource rightsizing) and horizontal scaling disabled. This is useful for workloads where replica count should remain fixed but container resources should be auto-tuned.

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Additional Notes

Add a new "datadog-vertical-only" built-in cluster profile that creates
DPAs with only vertical scaling enabled (resource rightsizing) and
horizontal scaling disabled. This is useful for workloads where replica
count should remain fixed but container resources should be auto-tuned.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Oct 9, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Oct 9, 2026

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI review by Codex (OpenAI) - workflow run

The patch is correct. The new profile disables both horizontal scaling directions and fallback while enabling automatic vertical updates for all containers. No actionable issues were found. Tests could not run in the read-only environment because the Go module cache is unavailable.

@datadog-prod-us1-3

datadog-prod-us1-3 Bot commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 62.78% (+4.18%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 1552456 | Docs | Give us feedback!

@TitouanGuesdon TitouanGuesdon added the qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation label Oct 9, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor 8d6360c8:

Results for datadog-agent_7.86.0~devel.git.315.1552456.pipeline.143717458-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

Results for datadog-iot-agent_7.86.0~devel.git.315.1552456.pipeline.143717458-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor 8d6360c
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
✅ agent_deb_amd64 +4.66 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.09% of buffer) 755.202 → 755.207 → 760.520
✅ agent_rpm_amd64 +4.66 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.09% of buffer) 755.186 → 755.190 → 760.500
✅ agent_suse_amd64 +4.66 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.09% of buffer) 755.186 → 755.190 → 760.500
✅ docker_agent_amd64 +4.66 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.08% of buffer) 811.365 → 811.369 → 816.720
✅ docker_agent_jmx_amd64 +4.66 KiB (0.00% increase, -0.08% of buffer) 1002.235 → 1002.239 → 1007.590
✅ docker_cluster_agent_arm64 +64.75 KiB (0.03% increase, -1.95% of buffer) 224.162 → 224.225 → 227.410
26 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
✅ agent_deb_amd64_fips 688.224 MiB
✅ agent_heroku_amd64 319.086 MiB
✅ agent_rpm_amd64_fips 688.208 MiB
✅ agent_rpm_arm64 725.738 MiB
✅ agent_rpm_arm64_fips 664.321 MiB
✅ agent_suse_amd64_fips 688.208 MiB
✅ agent_suse_arm64 725.738 MiB
✅ agent_suse_arm64_fips 664.321 MiB
✅ docker_agent_arm64 806.544 MiB
✅ docker_agent_jmx_arm64 986.194 MiB
✅ docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.443 MiB
✅ docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.877 MiB
✅ docker_dogstatsd_amd64 39.547 MiB
✅ docker_dogstatsd_arm64 37.629 MiB
✅ docker_host_profiler_amd64 308.722 MiB
✅ docker_host_profiler_arm64 319.865 MiB
✅ dogstatsd_deb_amd64 30.289 MiB
✅ dogstatsd_deb_arm64 28.278 MiB
✅ dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 30.289 MiB
✅ dogstatsd_suse_amd64 30.289 MiB
✅ iot_agent_deb_amd64 47.371 MiB
✅ iot_agent_deb_arm64 43.837 MiB
✅ iot_agent_deb_armhf 44.652 MiB
✅ iot_agent_rpm_amd64 47.371 MiB
✅ iot_agent_suse_amd64 47.370 MiB
✅ docker_cluster_agent_amd64 211.197 MiB

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Job ID: ee2fbffb-5737-4818-8c6a-69082a58e527

Baseline: 8d6360c
Comparison: 1552456
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
➖ quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +2.00 [+1.77, +2.23] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization +0.64 [+0.60, +0.68] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ dsd_uds_10mb_3k_timestamped_contexts_cpu % cpu utilization +0.57 [+0.35, +0.80] 1 Logs
➖ dsd_uds_client_drop_detector_cpu % cpu utilization +0.52 [+0.02, +1.01] 1 Logs
➖ python_openmetrics % cpu utilization +0.21 [-0.47, +0.90] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization +0.17 [+0.13, +0.21] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization -0.13 [-0.20, -0.05] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.15 [-0.19, -0.12] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.33 [-0.41, -0.26] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ quality_gate_private_action_runner memory utilization -0.37 [-0.50, -0.25] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.47 [-1.32, +0.39] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
➖ dsd_uds_10mb_3k_timestamped_contexts_memory memory utilization -0.52 [-0.74, -0.30] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
✅ python_openmetrics checks_execution_time 10/10 76.83 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
✅ python_openmetrics cpu_usage 10/10 1339.11 ≤ 1500 bounds checks dashboard
✅ python_openmetrics memory_usage 10/10 4.32GiB ≤ 4.75GiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 5 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 176.86MiB ≤ 181MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 764.52KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 2 ≤ 5 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 475.02MiB ≤ 542MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.13MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 16 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 212.37MiB ≤ 228MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 263.91MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 365.69 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 19 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 411.88MiB ≤ 455MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.95GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_private_action_runner memory_usage 10/10 74.02MiB ≤ 77MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 29.51 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 330.35MiB ≤ 357MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 63.92 ≤ 200 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 309.72MiB ≤ 337MiB bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 23.35 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
✅ quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 313.54MiB ≤ 348MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/container-autoscaling

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant