-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable device scan command #29553
Enable device scan command #29553
Conversation
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=46292309 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit de2d141 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
capitalization nit
releasenotes/notes/enable-snmp-device-scan-command-d77dca95b30cb3e8.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we want a changelog entry since it's a hidden feature; this PR may also be unnecessary given Florian's #29148, which provides the command via the dependency injector and does mark it as hidden
da67a53
to
46beb89
Compare
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: a2bbdf1 Regression Detector: ✅ Bounds Checks: ✅ No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | +1.79 | [-2.19, +5.77] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | +1.28 | [-2.28, +4.84] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.07 | [+1.00, +1.14] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.79 | [+0.75, +0.84] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.16 | [+0.05, +0.27] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.12 | [-0.37, +0.61] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.20, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.21, +0.23] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.10, +0.11] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.36, +0.32] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.22, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -0.30 | [-1.11, +0.51] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.47 | [-0.56, -0.38] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -3.34 | [-4.05, -2.64] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks Passed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | idle | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
Action not found: mergex If you need support, contact us on Slack #devflow! |
/merge |
🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue The median merge time in Use |
What does this PR do?
Enable device scan command
Motivation
Enable device scan command
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Simply running
agent snmp scan --help
should return the command help.You can also try doing an actual scan with
agent snmp scan <ipaddress>[:port] [flags]
.Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes