Skip to content

Conversation

celenechang
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Update Google Marketplace deployer image data for the Datadog Operator 1.4.0 release. This has no impact on the Datadog Agent.

@celenechang celenechang added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Feb 27, 2024
@celenechang celenechang requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2024 14:13
@celenechang celenechang force-pushed the celene/operator_gcp_1.4.0 branch from 74f8bc3 to ed931c2 Compare February 27, 2024 14:14
@celenechang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Feb 27, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@celenechang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Feb 27, 2024

❌ MergeQueue

PR is already in db with waiting status

If you need support, contact us on Slack #ci-interfaces with those details!

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: cde69c1e-fde5-4549-befa-8482ec9cb823
Baseline: af760b8
Comparison: b016649
Total CPUs: 7

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

Experiments with missing or malformed data

  • basic_py_check

Usually, this warning means that there is no usable optimization goal data for that experiment, which could be a result of misconfiguration.

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
file_to_blackhole % cpu utilization +1.34 [-5.26, +7.94]

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +1.51 [+1.43, +1.58]
file_to_blackhole % cpu utilization +1.34 [-5.26, +7.94]
process_agent_standard_check memory utilization +0.09 [+0.04, +0.15]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00]
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00]
trace_agent_json ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.04, +0.03]
trace_agent_msgpack ingress throughput -0.02 [-0.04, -0.01]
process_agent_real_time_mode memory utilization -0.11 [-0.16, -0.06]
idle memory utilization -0.14 [-0.18, -0.09]
process_agent_standard_check_with_stats memory utilization -0.26 [-0.30, -0.21]
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.42 [-1.07, +0.23]
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.44 [-1.86, +0.98]
file_tree memory utilization -0.78 [-0.88, -0.67]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Feb 27, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue

Added to the queue.

There are 10 builds ahead of this PR! (estimated merge in less than 2h)

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 5aba3a1 into main Feb 27, 2024
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the celene/operator_gcp_1.4.0 branch February 27, 2024 20:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.53.0 milestone Feb 27, 2024
louis-cqrl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
)

[operator][google marketplace] update to latest helm chart 1.5.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants