Skip to content

Conversation

@DashCoreAutoGuix
Copy link
Owner

Backports bitcoin#29639

Original commit: 9f2609d

Backported from Bitcoin Core v0.28

432a542 test: fix intermittent failures with test=addrman (Martin Zumsande)

Pull request description:

  The `nKey` of the addrman is generated the first time the node is started with an empty `peers.dat`. Therefore, restarting a node or turning it off and on again won't make a previously non-deterministic addrman deterministic.
  This could lead to intermittent failures in `feature_asmap.py` and `rpc_net.py`

  Fixes bitcoin#29634

ACKs for top commit:
  kevkevinpal:
    ACK [432a542](bitcoin@432a542)
  stratospher:
    Tested ACK 432a542.
  brunoerg:
    crACK 432a542
  0xB10C:
    ACK 432a542

Tree-SHA512: a8e284baeb0be2df7284b8a2792cb9edc9e2d5b877a3b29ab7277ffdb75b17efa58a4d42576441eb493cd518e7c5ffdb05597b27e42b5001cf1a80e78bb04c83
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 9, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@DashCoreAutoGuix has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4202b5 and 3f25f36.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • test/functional/feature_asmap.py (1 hunks)
  • test/functional/rpc_net.py (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch backport-0.28-batch-740-pr-29639

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@DashCoreAutoGuix
Copy link
Owner Author

✅ Backport Verification Successful

No issues found! This backport is complete and faithful to the original Bitcoin change.

Original Bitcoin commit: 9f2609de09e
Backport PR: #1120
Reviewed commit hash: 3f25f361c32-verify-1754735920

Verification Details:

  • File operations match Bitcoin's intent
  • No missing changes detected
  • No scope creep or dependency explosions
  • CI checks passing (31/31)
  • PR comments reviewed and addressed

Reviewer Feedback Analysis:

PastaPastaPasta comments reviewed: 0
Other human comments reviewed: 0

No reviewer concerns to address - clean backport with no outstanding feedback.

This PR is ready for merge. ✅

Technical Summary:

This PR backports Bitcoin's fix for intermittent test failures in addrman-related tests. The solution adds -test=addrman flag and clear_addrman=True parameter to ensure deterministic addrman behavior during testing by clearing any existing non-deterministic addrman data.

Changes are identical to Bitcoin:

  • Size match: 100% (2 files, 5 additions, 2 deletions)
  • Files: test/functional/feature_asmap.py, test/functional/rpc_net.py
  • Intent preserved: Fix flaky test behavior caused by non-deterministic addrman

The backport is technically sound and maintains the exact same logic as the Bitcoin implementation.

@DashCoreAutoGuix DashCoreAutoGuix added the verified Backport verification passed - ready for merge label Aug 9, 2025
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta added ci-failed PR has one or more failing CI jobs and removed verified Backport verification passed - ready for merge labels Aug 21, 2025
@DashCoreAutoGuix
Copy link
Owner Author

⚠️ Validation requires manual intervention

Validation Analysis: ✅ PASSED

  • Size ratio: 100% (perfect match)
  • File count: Bitcoin 2, Dash 2 (perfect match)
  • No missing or extra files
  • Backport structure is faithful to original Bitcoin commit

CI Status: 🚫 BLOCKS APPROVAL

  • 2 CI jobs failing (threshold: max 1 allowed)
  • Agent is prohibited from approving PRs with >1 failing CI job

Critical Issue: Both test failures are in the exact tests this Bitcoin commit aims to fix:

  • feature_asmap.py - Failed in linux64_nowallet-test
  • rpc_net.py --v2transport - Failed in linux64-test

Analysis: This backport implements Bitcoin Core's fix for intermittent test failures, but these specific tests are still failing. This requires manual review to determine:

  1. Whether the backport correctly implements the Bitcoin fix
  2. If multiple test runs are needed to validate intermittency improvements
  3. Whether Dash-specific adaptations are needed

Recommendation: Manual review required to validate that the fix reduces test intermittency as intended.

@DashCoreAutoGuix DashCoreAutoGuix added the needs-fixes Requires manual fixes to address verification issues label Aug 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-failed PR has one or more failing CI jobs needs-fixes Requires manual fixes to address verification issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants