Remove permissions from pnpm-format-label workflow

[Dargon789]

Removed permissions section from the workflow.

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

• Remove the contents and issues permissions block from the pnpm-format-label workflow, relying on default GitHub Actions permissions instead.

[codesandbox]

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders

Open Preview

[bolt-new-by-stackblitz]

Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
sequence-js-docs	Ready	Preview, Comment	Dec 26, 2025 8:34pm
sequence-js-web	Ready	Preview, Comment	Dec 26, 2025 8:34pm
sequence.js	Canceled		Dec 26, 2025 8:34pm
wagmi-project	Canceled		Dec 26, 2025 8:34pm

[gemini-code-assist]

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This PR simplifies the pnpm-format-label GitHub Actions workflow by removing its custom permissions block so that the workflow inherits the repository or organization default permissions instead.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Workflow no longer declares explicit GitHub token permissions and will now rely on default permissions configuration.	Removed the top-level permissions block from the pnpm-format-label workflow configuration Eliminated explicit contents: read and issues: write token permissions from the workflow	.github/workflows/on_pr_pnpm-format-label.yml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[snyk-io]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scanner	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

• Removing the explicit issues: write permission may cause this workflow to fail if it still needs to modify labels or issues; consider confirming the required scopes and either relying on repo-level default write permissions or retaining a minimal explicit permission block.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Removing the explicit `issues: write` permission may cause this workflow to fail if it still needs to modify labels or issues; consider confirming the required scopes and either relying on repo-level default write permissions or retaining a minimal explicit permission block.

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}