-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Create ci-foundry.yml #57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Dargon789 <64915515+Dargon789@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Deployment failed with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/dargon789-forge?upgradeToPro=build-rate-limit |
Reviewer's GuideAdds a new CircleCI pipeline configuration file defining a custom Docker-based executor and a simple workflow/job for the project. Flow diagram for CircleCI job steps in web3-defi-game-projectflowchart LR
A[Start pipeline] --> B[workflow my-custom-workflow]
B --> C[job web3-defi-game-project]
C --> D[Use executor my-custom-executor]
D --> E[Checkout repository]
E --> F[Run command: echo Build started]
F --> G[End job]
G --> H[End workflow]
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse. |
Summary of ChangesHello @Dargon789, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a foundational continuous integration setup by adding a new CircleCI configuration file. This file defines a custom Docker executor, configures Docker Hub authentication, and sets up a basic build job within a workflow. This change establishes the initial framework for automated build processes within the repository. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
- Consider moving the Docker Hub credentials from inline
authto a CircleCI context or reusable executor configuration so they can be centrally managed and reused across other jobs. - The job name
web3-defi-game-projectand workflow namemy-custom-workfloware quite generic; renaming them to reflect the actual purpose of this pipeline (e.g.,buildorlint) will make the config easier to understand and extend.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- Consider moving the Docker Hub credentials from inline `auth` to a CircleCI context or reusable executor configuration so they can be centrally managed and reused across other jobs.
- The job name `web3-defi-game-project` and workflow name `my-custom-workflow` are quite generic; renaming them to reflect the actual purpose of this pipeline (e.g., `build` or `lint`) will make the config easier to understand and extend.
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `.circleci/ci-foundry.yml:9-13` </location>
<code_context>
+ my-custom-executor:
+ docker:
+ - image: cimg/base:stable
+ auth:
+ # ensure you have first added these secrets
+ # visit app.circleci.com/settings/project/github/Dargon789/foundry/environment-variables
+ username: $DOCKER_HUB_USER
+ password: $DOCKER_HUB_PASSWORD
+jobs:
+ web3-defi-game-project:
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**🚨 suggestion (security):** Consider using CircleCI contexts or a dedicated service account for Docker Hub credentials
Project-level env vars will work, but consider moving these to a CircleCI context backed by a least-privilege Docker Hub service account instead of a personal account. This improves credential scoping, simplifies rotation, and lets you control where the credentials can be used across projects.
Suggested implementation:
```
my-custom-executor:
docker:
- image: cimg/base:stable
auth:
# Docker Hub credentials are provided via the "docker-hub-service-account" context
# Create a least-privilege Docker Hub service account and add these env vars to that context:
# - DOCKER_HUB_SVC_USERNAME
# - DOCKER_HUB_SVC_PASSWORD
# See: https://circleci.com/docs/contexts/
username: $DOCKER_HUB_SVC_USERNAME
password: $DOCKER_HUB_SVC_PASSWORD
```
```
my-custom-workflow:
jobs:
- web3-defi-game-project:
context:
- docker-hub-service-account
```
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new CircleCI configuration file. The initial setup is a good start. My review includes several suggestions to improve the configuration based on common best practices. These include pinning the Docker image version for reproducible builds, using more descriptive and conventional names for the executor, job, and workflow, making comments about secrets more generic, and improving the structure of run steps. These changes will enhance the maintainability and reliability of the CI pipeline.
What changed? Why?
Notes to reviewers
How has it been tested?
Summary by Sourcery
CI: