Create nuxtjs.yml

[Dargon789]

• Because this PR includes a bug fix, relevant tests have been included.
• Because this PR includes a new feature, the change was previously discussed on an Issue or with someone from the team.
• I didn't do anything of this.

---

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

• Introduce a GitHub Actions workflow that detects the package manager, builds the Nuxt static site, and deploys it to GitHub Pages with caching and concurrency controls.

[codesandbox]

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders

Open Preview

[vercel]

Deployment failed with the following error:

Resource is limited - try again in 1 hour (more than 100, code: "api-deployments-free-per-day").

Learn More: https://vercel.com/dargon789-forge?upgradeToPro=build-rate-limit

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

Adds a GitHub Actions workflow configuration to build and deploy a Nuxt application to GitHub Pages on pushes to main and manual triggers, handling Node setup, dependency installation, static site generation, artifact upload, and deployment with concurrency controls.

Sequence diagram for GitHub Actions build and deploy to GitHub Pages

sequenceDiagram
  actor Developer
  participant GitHub
  participant Workflow as Actions_Workflow
  participant BuildJob as Job_build
  participant DeployJob as Job_deploy
  participant Pages as GitHub_Pages

  Developer->>GitHub: Push to main or trigger workflow_dispatch
  GitHub->>Workflow: Start workflow Deploy_Nuxt_site_to_Pages

  Workflow->>BuildJob: Start job build
  BuildJob->>BuildJob: actions/checkout@v4
  BuildJob->>BuildJob: Detect package manager (yarn or npm)
  BuildJob->>BuildJob: actions/setup-node@v4 (Node 20, cache)
  BuildJob->>BuildJob: actions/configure-pages@v5 (static_site_generator=nuxt)
  BuildJob->>BuildJob: actions/cache@v4 (.nuxt, dist)
  BuildJob->>BuildJob: Install dependencies
  BuildJob->>BuildJob: nuxt generate (static export to dist)
  BuildJob->>Workflow: Upload artifact (dist) via upload-pages-artifact
  Workflow-->>BuildJob: Artifact stored for deployment

  Workflow->>DeployJob: Start job deploy (needs build)
  DeployJob->>Workflow: Retrieve pages artifact
  DeployJob->>Pages: Deploy static site via deploy-pages@v4
  Pages-->>Developer: Updated Nuxt site available on GitHub Pages

Loading

Flow diagram for Nuxt CI/CD pipeline to GitHub Pages

flowchart TD
  A["Start: push to main or workflow_dispatch"]
  B["Job build: checkout code"]
  C{package manager file?}
  C1["Found yarn.lock -> manager=yarn, command=install"]
  C2["Found package.json -> manager=npm, command=ci"]
  C3["No known file -> fail workflow"]
  D["Setup Node 20 with cache (actions/setup-node)"]
  E["Configure Pages for Nuxt static export (configure-pages)"]
  F["Restore cache for .nuxt and dist (actions/cache)"]
  G["Install dependencies (npm ci or yarn install)"]
  H["Run nuxt generate (static HTML export to dist)"]
  I["Upload dist as Pages artifact (upload-pages-artifact)"]
  J["Job deploy (needs build)"]
  K["Deploy artifact to GitHub Pages (deploy-pages)"]
  L["Site available on GitHub Pages"]

  A --> B --> C
  C -->|yarn.lock| C1 --> D
  C -->|package.json| C2 --> D
  C -->|none| C3

  D --> E --> F --> G --> H --> I --> J --> K --> L

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Introduce CI/CD workflow to build and deploy Nuxt static site to GitHub Pages.	Create a workflow triggered by pushes to the main branch and manual dispatch, with appropriate GITHUB_TOKEN permissions and concurrency settings for pages deployments. Add a build job that checks out the repo, detects the package manager (yarn or npm), sets up Node 20 with caching, configures GitHub Pages for a Nuxt static site, restores a Nuxt build cache, installs dependencies, runs generate to produce static files, and uploads the dist directory as a Pages artifact. Add a deploy job that depends on the build job and publishes the uploaded Pages artifact using the deploy-pages action, exposing the deployed page URL via the environment configuration.	.circleci/nuxtjs.yml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Dargon789, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow, nuxtjs.yml, aimed at streamlining the continuous deployment of Nuxt.js applications to GitHub Pages. The workflow automates the entire process from code changes to main to a live static site, handling environment setup, dependency management, static site generation, and final deployment.

Highlights

• New GitHub Actions Workflow: A new workflow file, nuxtjs.yml, has been added to the .circleci directory. This workflow is designed to automate the build and deployment process for Nuxt.js applications.
• Nuxt.js Deployment to GitHub Pages: The workflow configures a two-stage process (build and deploy) to generate a static Nuxt.js site and publish it to GitHub Pages, triggered by pushes to the main branch or manual dispatch.
• Automated Build Steps: The build job includes steps for checking out code, automatically detecting the package manager (npm or yarn), setting up Node.js v20, configuring GitHub Pages for Nuxt, caching build artifacts, installing dependencies, and running the Nuxt generate command for static HTML export.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[sourcery-ai]

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

• The workflow file is placed under .circleci/nuxtjs.yml but is a GitHub Actions config, so it should live under .github/workflows/ to actually run as an Actions workflow.
• The cache key currently uses hashFiles('dist'), but dist is a build output directory and may not exist or be stable; consider hashing package-lock.json/yarn.lock and caching node_modules or .nuxt instead to get more reliable caching.
• The Detect package manager step treats the presence of package.json as meaning npm ci is safe to run; if there’s no package-lock.json, this will fail, so it may be worth explicitly checking for package-lock.json before choosing npm ci.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The workflow file is placed under `.circleci/nuxtjs.yml` but is a GitHub Actions config, so it should live under `.github/workflows/` to actually run as an Actions workflow.
- The cache key currently uses `hashFiles('dist')`, but `dist` is a build output directory and may not exist or be stable; consider hashing `package-lock.json`/`yarn.lock` and caching `node_modules` or `.nuxt` instead to get more reliable caching.
- The `Detect package manager` step treats the presence of `package.json` as meaning `npm ci` is safe to run; if there’s no `package-lock.json`, this will fail, so it may be worth explicitly checking for `package-lock.json` before choosing `npm ci`.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `.circleci/nuxtjs.yml:68` </location>
<code_context>
+          path: |
+            dist
+            .nuxt
+          key: ${{ runner.os }}-nuxt-build-${{ hashFiles('dist') }}
+          restore-keys: |
+            ${{ runner.os }}-nuxt-build-
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (performance):** Consider basing the cache key on dependency files instead of the `dist` directory.

`hashFiles('dist')` won’t give you a meaningful key here: `dist` doesn’t exist before the build, so the hash will usually be empty and the cache key effectively constant and unrelated to dependency changes. Prefer hashing lockfiles instead, e.g. `hashFiles('**/package-lock.json', '**/yarn.lock')`, so the cache is tied to the dependency set while still reusing `.nuxt`/`dist` between builds with the same dependencies.

```suggestion
          key: ${{ runner.os }}-nuxt-build-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json', '**/yarn.lock', '**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}
```
</issue_to_address>

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a GitHub Actions workflow for building and deploying a Nuxt.js site. My review has identified a few critical issues that need to be addressed. Firstly, the workflow file is placed in the .circleci directory, but GitHub Actions workflows must be located in .github/workflows/ to be discovered and executed. Secondly, the package manager detection logic is flawed as it doesn't support pnpm, which is used in this project. This will cause the build to fail. Lastly, the build artifact caching is implemented incorrectly: the cache key is based on build output instead of source files, which could lead to stale deployments, and the cache is not used to skip build steps, rendering it ineffective. I've provided specific suggestions to fix these issues.