Skip to content

Conversation

@Dargon789
Copy link
Owner

@Dargon789 Dargon789 commented Oct 23, 2025

1c2bf1a
https://app.codecov.io/gh/Dargon789/Ethereumjs-Webserver/commit/1c2bf1a1701a14ac4db34bdff8fca85847b3a023/tree?search=&displayType=list

Summary by Sourcery

Update Codecov configuration to enforce CI gating, refine coverage metrics, and enable GitHub checks and Slack notifications

Enhancements:

  • Enable wait_for_ci and require_ci_to_pass for notification gating
  • Restructure comment layout with default behavior and flag carryforward settings
  • Set coverage precision, rounding, and acceptable range
  • Adjust status rules: disable change status, include default rules, and update patch/project thresholds
  • Enable GitHub annotations and Slack app integration
  • Remove redundant layout definition and embed configuration as to_string

Signed-off-by: Dargon789 <64915515+Dargon789@users.noreply.github.com>
@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

Enhance Codecov YAML by adding notification and integration controls, reorganizing status rules, refining coverage thresholds and formatting, and including a to_string YAML dump.

Flow diagram for Codecov status and coverage rules update

flowchart TD
  Start["Codecov YAML Update"] --> Notify["Add notify: wait_for_ci & require_ci_to_pass"]
  Notify --> Comment["Update comment behavior & layout"]
  Comment --> Coverage["Refine coverage: precision, range, round"]
  Coverage --> Status["Reorganize status: changes, default_rules, patch, project"]
  Status --> Flags["Update flags: carryforward"]
  Flags --> Integrations["Add github_checks & slack_app"]
  Integrations --> ToString["Include to_string YAML dump"]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Introduce notification and CI requirements
  • Add codecov.notify.wait_for_ci
  • Enable require_ci_to_pass under codecov
codecov.yml
Refine comment behavior
  • Set comment.behavior to default
  • Specify layout as reach, flags
  • Disable show_carryforward_flags
codecov.yml
Update coverage thresholds and formatting
  • Set precision to 2 and round down
  • Define coverage range [60.0, 80.0]
  • Raise patch threshold to 5.0
  • Adjust project threshold to 2.0
codecov.yml
Reorganize status rules
  • Disable status.changes
  • Add default_rules.flag_coverage_not_uploaded_behavior
  • Restructure patch and project rules under status
codecov.yml
Add integration settings and output dump
  • Enable github_checks.annotations
  • Enable slack_app support
  • Add to_string key for YAML serialization
codecov.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@snyk-io
Copy link

snyk-io bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Dargon789, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly updates and expands the Codecov configuration file (codecov.yml). The changes aim to provide more precise control over coverage reporting, enhance integration with CI/CD workflows, and improve notification mechanisms. The update introduces new top-level configuration sections and refines existing ones to better manage how code coverage is calculated, displayed, and communicated.

Highlights

  • Enhanced Codecov Configuration: Introduced top-level codecov settings to control CI notification waiting and requiring CI to pass, ensuring more robust integration with the CI pipeline.
  • Detailed Coverage Status Rules: Configured coverage with precision, range, and round settings, along with granular status rules for patch and project coverage, including changes and default_rules for better control over coverage reporting.
  • Improved Commenting and Integration: Updated the comment section with default behavior and options for carrying forward flags, and added direct integration for github_checks annotations and slack_app notifications.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `codecov.yml:33` </location>
<code_context>
+github_checks:
+  annotations: true
+slack_app: true
+to_string: "codecov:\n  notify:\n    wait_for_ci: true\n  require_ci_to_pass: true\n\
+  comment:\n  behavior: default\n  layout: reach, flags\n  show_carryforward_flags:\
+  \ false\ncoverage:\n  precision: 2\n  range:\n  - 60.0\n  - 80.0\n  round: down\n\
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**issue:** Including a 'to_string' field with the full config as a string is unconventional.

This field duplicates the config and is not standard practice. Please remove it unless there is a clear, documented need.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the codecov.yml file to use a more modern and comprehensive configuration, including CI gating, GitHub checks, and more specific coverage metrics. While these are excellent improvements, a significant issue has been introduced with the to_string key. This key contains a redundant string representation of the entire configuration, which is not a valid Codecov setting and will create maintenance problems. It should be removed.

@Dargon789 Dargon789 merged commit 111f39f into 41-vercelbot Oct 23, 2025
48 of 51 checks passed
@Dargon789 Dargon789 deleted the Dargon789-patch-3 branch October 23, 2025 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#### Flow diagram for dynamic VM and blockchain test matrices in CI ethereum-master

2 participants