Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bumps sf-hamilton-ui version to 0.0.17 #1296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

elijahbenizzy
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@elijahbenizzy elijahbenizzy merged commit b4a03e7 into main Mar 21, 2025
2 of 7 checks passed
@elijahbenizzy elijahbenizzy deleted the hamilton-ui-0.0.17-version-bump branch March 21, 2025 04:12
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 30d1434 in 48 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. ui/backend/setup.py:21
  • Draft comment:
    Version bump updated to 0.0.17. Ensure corresponding release notes and sphinx documentation (e.g., docs/ReleaseNotes.rst) are updated with the changes.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
    The comment violates the rule "Do NOT ask the PR author to confirm their intention, to explain, to double-check things, to ensure the behavior is intended". The comment starts with "Ensure that..." which is explicitly called out as likely not useful. While documentation is important, this kind of reminder comment is not the right way to enforce it.
    Documentation updates are important for version changes. Maybe this comment serves as a useful reminder of process requirements?
    While documentation is important, the rules explicitly state not to make comments that ask authors to verify or ensure things. Process requirements should be handled through other means like PR templates or CI checks.
    The comment should be deleted as it violates the rule about not asking authors to verify or ensure things, and it's more of a process reminder than a code issue.
2. ui/backend/setup.py:21
  • Draft comment:
    Version bump to 0.0.17 is correct. Consider updating the changelog (e.g., docs/changelog.rst) to reflect this change if not done already.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
    None
3. ui/backend/setup.py:25
  • Draft comment:
    Typographical error: The author name 'Elijah ben Izzy' should be capitalized as 'Elijah Ben Izzy' for consistency and proper naming.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. ui/backend/setup.py:45
  • Draft comment:
    Typographical/lexical consistency issue: In the comment on line 45, 'setup tools' should be corrected to 'setuptools' to match the actual module name imported at the top.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_MTQgr1tujTBJPnpT


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant