Skip to content

Conditional κ = 0.001659319032684569: six dim-8 cold ends and three entrance promotions on the PR659 no-triangle word - #676

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
jeremykothe2:g44-promo-p6
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
jeremykothe2:g44-promo-p6

Conversation

@jeremykothe2

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Conditional κ = 0.001659319032684569 (conservative 0.001659319029797309). This is +6.04×10⁻⁷ over PR671 (0.001658714981837397). The complex side binds; PR589's bit supplier gives 0.0017334.

Construction, on PR659's no-triangle layered word (sha a9de804f):

  1. p6n: six dim-8 cold ends in three pairs, [512,513] at U66_34_16, [311,510] at U72_40 and [522,327] at U66_34_18, each with one dim-6 partner split. Δ{1:+6, 2:+12, 3:−12}, width −6. This is the p123 lane re-chosen so that no end needs a second split on the no-triangle word.
  2. Three entrance promotions (as in PR664) on top, using a minimal deterministic recipe that raises only each group's entry gates (36 gate frames). Δ{1:+24, 2:−24, 3:−12, 4:+12}, width −12.

Width 3782 per call. The owner map is at this word's exact packing ceiling (idle 2391 × rank-48). It was found by an exact pattern-flow search in the style of PR660, which releases every defect window class across all calls in one HiGHS solve; it equals the packing relaxation's optimal bound.

Construction drivers: construction/layers_p6n/reproduce_p6n.py (rebuilds p6n 34b683fa from PR659's word, with 95 per-end controls) and a generalised construction/promo/reproduce_promo.py --base p6n (rebuilds a38bb414, with 10 promotion controls). All verifier code is byte-identical to PR659/PR664's reviewed set.

Independent reviews: both SOUND. One reviewer covered the p6n layer and driver: exact replay with 0 bad rows, (N) 21/21, payload 55/72 bits, 95/95 controls plus 165 extra mutants, and a clean clone that reproduces this κ. A second covered the promotions and the committed tree: byte-identical rebuild, 10/10 controls plus its own mutants rejected by both audits, the full 8-step clean rebuild, and its own strict run reproducing this κ.

Verification

From a fresh clone of commit 18649d6, with no reused artifacts (Windows, CPython 3.11.11):

  • verify_manifest.py: PASS, 116 files
  • reproduce.py, reproduce_notri.py, reproduce_np.py: PR659's word rebuilt
  • reproduce_p6n.py: p6n rebuilt; PASS layer-end-controls 95
  • reproduce_promo.py --base p6n --k p6n-k3: PASS promo-controls, PASS layer-end-controls, PASS phases
  • audit_local.py: PASS_INDEPENDENT_EXACT_FORWARD_AND_DUAL_ENDPOINT_FRAMES_ENTRANCES_CONES
  • verify_global.py: PASS invoice, assembly, admission-controls and bit-supplier-controls; PASS_GAUGE44_NATIVE_EXACT_GLOBAL_ASSEMBLY 0.001659319032684569

The rebuilt locals equal the strict locals except two seconds timing fields. Exact commands are in research/gauge44-promo-p6/README.md.

Scope

Conditional on PR645's premises and on PR589's bit-supplier assumptions. No unconditional theorem or Lean certification is claimed.

Credits

  • icekylinx (PR645): gauge44 construction, package and verifier.
  • chafreaky (PR660): the exact pattern-flow packing approach; jeremydiviney (PR658), jaymosley07 (PR653) and vectorsss (PR638): owner-search methods.
  • PR589 lineage (bit supplier); the PR601/604/617/622/627/635 lineage and every upstream contributor credited in PR645.

Prepared with Claude Code (Anthropic).

… entrance promotions on the no-triangle word
@Mister-Meeseeks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The 20-PR pilot triaged 18649d6b37a6865894e0c0775ba4b558e3168877 and is leaving this PR open for focused follow-up.

Remaining maintainer review: Authenticate/replay six new cold ends and minimal promotion recipe; then changed owner/phase/global admission. Reuse unchanged #659/#664 code only with complete source-bound artifact coverage.

This is a bounded-review disposition, not a rejection or a request to repeat unrelated full-suite checks. Pilot record. Your contribution and original attribution remain in the queue ledger.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants