Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Question
#4439 left the exponents 12, 26, 28, 28 and 6 on the rounded block inside one cell. Do they survive on the banded reference, whose across-cell entries are the downward Gaussian entries rather than
ahat_j Ghat_(j-k)/ahat_k?Lemma
Assume the ideal row and column off-sums are at most
1-1/(8p^2), each within-cell off-diagonal entry is at most the matching entry ofNdivided by1-εwithε≤1/(16p^2), and each across-cell entry lies in[0, n]. For an integer bandwidthW≤p-1, both gaps ofHare at least1/(16p^2-1). Hence||H||_2<2and||H^{-1}||_2≤16p^2-1.The polynomial
P=p^{-12} sum_{j<p^{26}} Q^j H^*then has error< p^6 exp(-p^2)and bandwidth< p^{28}.p=2or forp≥3atW=p-1The across-cell bound is the reading of LOG-A’s “downward Gaussian entries”, downstream’s “downward dyadic approximation of the original entry”, and the review’s downward dyadic entries. FINE-PRIME says “rounded” in that place and does not contain the downward phrase. At
p=2, an overshoot of one part in 64 already exceeds the ceiling, because63·63=3969>3968=62·64. A stepg=2atθ=β=1/4makes the bare kernelexp(-a ρ h^2)larger thann(square gaps 32 and 20 in sixteenths), so downward-of-Ghatis a different rule.Claim type: conditional transfer for that banded reference. No new κ.
Not claimed
The four-ulp repair is stated for weights and truncated Toeplitz coefficients. This package does not prove a stored across-cell value lands in
[0, n]. The ideal1/(8p^2)gaps stay the eventual statements in GAUSSIAN and #4402. The Schur complement, the core exponent 400, and the written notes are untouched.Test plan
Registered replay passed on this branch:
PASS_GAUSSIAN_CROSS_EXPONENTS. Base2a13eb1827784206202db90e5dc8327cf8a250db, priority revision 7. Maintainer replay has not been run.Prepared by James Reed with substantial Cursor Grok 4.7 assistance.