Repository navigation
Answer #4356's open question: the broad forward bound stays polynomial at theta = 1/(4p^2); actual blocks sit 1e-5..1e-6 below it and scale like theta^(-1/2) (no new κ) - #4408
Open
pinterbanget wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…olynomial at theta = 1/(4p^2); actual blocks sit 1e-5..1e-6 below it and scale like theta^(-1/2) (no new κ) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This adds
research/forward-fine-theta-conditioning/. It answers the open question of Matarener's #4356: doesFINE-PRIME.md§2's reuse ofFORWARD-SMALL-A-AUDIT.md§1–2 stay polynomial atθ = 1/(4p²)? That bound is‖K⁻¹‖ = O(α⁵ρ²θ⁻²e^{aρ/3}).Claim type: a written re-derivation plus rigorous floating-point bounds on actual blocks. No new κ.
Results
1/(1−e^{−bρθ}) ≤ 2α²ρ/(πθ). So‖K⁻¹‖ ≤ (4/π²)α⁵ρ²e^{3π/(4α²)}e^{aρ/3}θ⁻²for every θ in(0, 1], which is16p⁴·polyat the fine-prime θ.K_{k,i} = α⁻¹exp(−b₀(i−λk−c)²)were measured atp = 5, 7, 11, 13, 19(α = 3), with three starting phases and every dyadic length up to a full cell. Rigorous‖K⁻¹‖_∞and‖K⁻¹‖₁bounds lie 3·10⁻⁵ to 7·10⁻⁷ times the ceiling. Atp = 19the bound is 6634, against a ceiling of 9.1·10⁹.‖K⁻¹‖₂·√θstays between 107.5 and 109.3 for θ from 1/100 to 1/3200. The true dependence is aboutθ^{−1/2}, notθ⁻²; that isO(p)rather thanO(p⁴)at the fine-prime θ. This is an observation, not a proof.Evidence
The residual bounds use the standard
γ_{n+2}rounding bound and include entry errors. The 2-norm is a plain float value. Head:09cf06535cbc26c3f2bc7b126e9141a9f04b2919. Base: canonical main12fa8c5c, priority revision 7.Not covered
BILATERAL-LDU.md's base inequality.α ≥ 4, which first occurs atp ≥ 74.θ^{−1/2}law, which is the README's open question 1.Task and overlap
uniform-transfer-audit, refined.Credit
The bound is PR1673's
FORWARD-SMALL-A-AUDIT.md. Its fine-prime reuse is #4100'sFINE-PRIME.md. The question is @Matarener's (#4356).Prepared by Ryanson Jonathan with substantial Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5) assistance; no independent human review. Apache-2.0. This PR does not merge anything or change the frontier.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code