- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 0
Update src/analyzer/code_analyzer.py #17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This report details each significant file and directory in the codebase, covering: - Purpose - Completion Status/Key Observations - Key Relations - Potential Enhancements/Improvements The report is based on a thorough examination of top-level files, the 'src' directory (including analyzer, converter, rules, and main entry point), 'examples', 'tests', existing 'docs', and the 'generated' C++ output.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR implements performance improvements to the code analyzer through expression type inference caching and adds better tuple unpacking support. The changes aim to reduce redundant type inference computations and handle more complex assignment patterns.
- Adds expression type caching to avoid redundant type inference work
- Improves tuple unpacking assignment handling with nested tuple support
- Refactors expression type inference methods for better maintainability
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.
| File | Description | 
|---|---|
| src/converter/code_generator.py | Adds type checking to handle both dict and object inputs for analysis results | 
| src/analyzer/code_analyzer_fixed.py | Implements comprehensive caching system and refactors type inference logic | 
| src/analyzer/code_analyzer.py | Adds basic caching and tuple unpacking support with debug logging improvements | 
| docs/ComprehensiveCodeAnalysisReport.md | New documentation file providing detailed project structure analysis | 
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
| print(f"Inferring expression type for: {type(node)}") | ||
| # Define a set of cacheable node types | ||
| cacheable_node_types = {ast.Constant, ast.Name, ast.List, ast.Dict, ast.Set, ast.Tuple} | ||
| cache_key = id(node) if type(node) in cacheable_node_types else None | 
    
      
    
      Copilot
AI
    
    
    
      Sep 28, 2025 
    
  
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using type(node) in cacheable_node_types is less efficient than isinstance(node, cacheable_node_types). Consider changing to isinstance(node, tuple(cacheable_node_types)) for better performance and consistency with the pattern used in code_analyzer_fixed.py.
| cache_key = id(node) if type(node) in cacheable_node_types else None | |
| cache_key = id(node) if isinstance(node, tuple(cacheable_node_types)) else None | 
| # Define cacheable node types | ||
| cacheable_node_types = (ast.Constant, ast.Name, ast.List, ast.Dict, ast.Tuple, ast.Set) | 
    
      
    
      Copilot
AI
    
    
    
      Sep 28, 2025 
    
  
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The cacheable node types are inconsistent between the two analyzer files. In code_analyzer.py it's a set with different ordering, while here it's a tuple. Consider standardizing the cacheable types and their representation across both files.
| # Define cacheable node types | |
| cacheable_node_types = (ast.Constant, ast.Name, ast.List, ast.Dict, ast.Tuple, ast.Set) | |
| # Define cacheable node types (standardized as a set, matching code_analyzer.py) | |
| cacheable_node_types = {ast.Constant, ast.Name, ast.List, ast.Dict, ast.Tuple, ast.Set} | 
| if cache_key is not None and cache_key in self._expr_type_cache: | ||
| return self._expr_type_cache[cache_key] | ||
|  | ||
| self.logger.debug(f"Inferring expression type for: {type(node)}") | 
    
      
    
      Copilot
AI
    
    
    
      Sep 28, 2025 
    
  
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The self.logger attribute is referenced but there's no logger initialization visible in the __init__ method of this class. This will likely cause an AttributeError at runtime.
| if isinstance(node.value.func, ast.Name): | ||
| func_name = node.value.func.id | ||
| if func_name in self.type_info: | ||
| return_type = self.type_info[func_name].get('return_type', 'std::tuple<int, int>') | 
    
      
    
      Copilot
AI
    
    
    
      Sep 28, 2025 
    
  
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code assumes self.type_info[func_name] is a dictionary, but earlier in the codebase self.type_info values can be strings. This will cause an AttributeError when calling .get() on a string value.
| return_type = self.type_info[func_name].get('return_type', 'std::tuple<int, int>') | |
| if isinstance(self.type_info[func_name], dict): | |
| return_type = self.type_info[func_name].get('return_type', 'std::tuple<int, int>') | |
| else: | |
| return_type = 'std::tuple<int, int>' | 
No description provided.