fix(operations): restack scheduler activation evidence on current main

[seonghobae]

Purpose

Create a clean protected-main successor for stale-lineage PR #222 without rebasing or force-pushing its history. This successor starts directly from protected main 11a0bb0c50bda5edaef944b1c1e4102bc2739363 and preserves the scheduler activation preflight, bounded public evidence, and executable regressions.

Exact source / scope

• protected-base parent at creation: 11a0bb0c50bda5edaef944b1c1e4102bc2739363;
• successor head at creation: 906110580fe65490990a11555bd03a74c03fc6fb;
• source predecessor: PR fix(operations): make hourly scheduler activation observable #222 exact head 4422dcd2b8eb7543186621bd4feca3b560af35b7;
• preserved exact predecessor blobs for five paths:
  • .github/workflows/hourly-commercial-readiness.yml 294debefc27b123dd29156eb703d38cf7d5e76c6;
  • docs/doctoring/hourly-scheduler-activation-feasibility.md f6ac1636309f85925e5c5dd632176f91a241274b;
  • docs/hourly-commercial-readiness-loop.md b0301aa54d8b59d414864af1aaf2a2e2799f7e0b;
  • test/hourly-commercial-readiness-activation.test.ts 4acc8ed9e3458332a20b627c9690ce39b3f525e6;
  • test/workflow-readiness.test.ts 5202f2af4696d900752f03117d9fc9f93454350c;
• the predecessor's historical CHANGELOG.md blob is intentionally not replayed because protected main has newer changelog history; any changelog delta must be applied against current protected-main content rather than copying stale lineage.

A fresh base-to-main comparison confirmed that protected main changed test/workflow-readiness.test.ts after the predecessor base. The preserved successor blob already contains both the scheduler activation assertion and the current 100% docstring-coverage gate, so that newer governance assertion is not regressed.

Operational boundary

The always-running preflight is read-only and exposes only bounded outcome classes. The credential-bearing Maintainer App lane remains separately gated and no GITHUB_TOKEN write fallback, protection bypass, credential-disclosure artifact, competing writer, repair workflow, or self-modifying workflow is introduced.

NO_ACTION_NEEDED is diagnostic evidence only. It is not merge approval, production acceptance, release/deployment evidence, licensing/IP authority, KPI evidence, or acquisition readiness.

Evidence boundary

No predecessor CI, review, scanner, model, scheduler, or production evidence transfers from #222. This Draft must obtain fresh exact-head application CI, reviewer CI, and protected-base-eligible central Security Scan evidence against its own unchanged head and live main. Pending, skipped, absent, predecessor, status-only, model-only, or rate-limited evidence is non-passing.

Before any merge, re-read live governance and central .github Security Scan authority, independently resolve live base/head, require zero valid unresolved findings, and verify exact checkout evidence. No approval requirement is invented when absent from live policy.

Supersedes #222 only after exact-delta validation and fresh terminal evidence establish this successor as technically sound.

Related: #96, #80, #27, #29

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 25 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c17fb527-ba84-4453-9e5a-352336c0bf17

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11a0bb0 and 9061105.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• .github/workflows/hourly-commercial-readiness.yml
• docs/doctoring/hourly-scheduler-activation-feasibility.md
• docs/hourly-commercial-readiness-loop.md
• test/hourly-commercial-readiness-activation.test.ts
• test/workflow-readiness.test.ts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}