π¨ Palette: ν₯μλ μ κ·Όμ±μ μν΄ μμ΄μ½ λ²νΌμ ν΄ν λ° aria-disabled μ μ© - #731
π¨ Palette: ν₯μλ μ κ·Όμ±μ μν΄ μμ΄μ½ λ²νΌμ ν΄ν λ° aria-disabled μ μ©#731seonghobae wants to merge 25 commits into
Conversation
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the βοΈ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head53ddb4c7452f96594cea0244cda853489fb934b0. -
Head SHA:
53ddb4c7452f96594cea0244cda853489fb934b0 -
Workflow run: 30684374373
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 3
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (5 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (7 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (7 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Dismissed after verifying the exact head SHA against the repository's CI, build-baseline, security, SAST, secret-scan, SBOM, Bandit, release, and security-audit workflows; all completed successfully. The automated coverage-evidence review does not identify a remaining code defect on this head.
|
@coderabbitai review |
β Action performedReview finished.
|
Pull request was converted to draft
Acknowledged. |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current headb12adcdc0c449d845d7d32ac4797a02c822e3653. -
Head SHA:
b12adcdc0c449d845d7d32ac4797a02c822e3653 -
Workflow run: 30822326101
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 3
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (6 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (6 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Dismissed because the only requested change came from the superseded central coverage environment. Exact-head repository checks succeeded and the prior security workflow artifact was removed; a fresh independent current-head approval remains mandatory.
|
@cwl-noema-review @opencode-agent Please independently review exact head |
Update disabled score title check to look for the localized "scoreNavDisabledHint" string instead of the native "Remove: opener.pdf" title, fixing a pipeline test suite failure due to the component dynamically swapping title values on disabled status.
Update disabled score title check to look for the localized "scoreNavDisabledHint" string instead of the native "Remove: opener.pdf" title, fixing a pipeline test suite failure due to the component dynamically swapping title values on disabled status.
Update disabled score title check to look for the localized "scoreNavDisabledHint" string instead of the native "Remove: opener.pdf" title, fixing a pipeline test suite failure due to the component dynamically swapping title values on disabled status.
Update disabled score title check to look for the localized "scoreNavDisabledHint" string instead of the native "Remove: opener.pdf" title, fixing a pipeline test suite failure due to the component dynamically swapping title values on disabled status. Also ensures that elements containing `aria-describedby` target IDs exist in the DOM as expected.
|
Queued @opencode-agent for PR #731 at head |
|
Queued @opencode-agent for PR #731 at head |
|
Queued @opencode-agent for PR #731 at head |
2 participants
Buyer-visible accessibility gap
Native
disabledremoves icon controls from the tab sequence and suppresses pointer events, so users cannot discover why an action is unavailable. Score PDF navigation/removal controls therefore remain focusable, explain their state to assistive technology and pointer users, and fail closed at the action boundary.Exact current change
Exact head:
8388b9ca841b8a6b6e4d094749986424d759ac49.Protected base:
develop@acdbea6344fe1231c39535b575f4de35e4c607c9.Exactly eleven files differ from protected
develop:apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreView.tsxapps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreView.test.tsxapps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreView.disabled-action-accessibility.test.tsxapps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreView.enabled-action-tooltips.test.tsxapps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.tsxapps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.test.tsxapps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.disabled-navigation-accessibility.test.tsxapps/desktop/src/locales/en/common.jsonapps/desktop/src/locales/ko/common.jsondocs/doctoring/accessible-disabled-score-navigation.mdCHANGELOG.mdThe branch contains no dependency, package manifest, lockfile, workflow, database, network, filesystem, model, or IPC authority change.
Behavior and evidence
aria-disabledexposes unavailable state;aria-describedbyassociates blocked score actions with the visible project requirement;titlehints explain recovery to pointer users while unavailable;aria-describedbytarget;CHANGELOG.mdUnreleased.Current-head repair history
A concurrent branch movement after the earlier reviewed head removed the pagination
aria-describedbyimplementation, its focused regression, and the doctoring rationale while the PR description still claimed that contract. The regression was verified against exact head65cd30dca863d976cd81575a4eb016b71d74fdc8rather than trusting the stale description.a3728f0d6ae8f6ca24b03105a6aad3c58cd66119restored the focused three-page pagination accessibility regression and required localized in-document descriptions at both boundaries.69236f4d82982f006b7f54e8391a4df45e7f321brestored renderer-owneduseId()targets and conditionalaria-describedbywithout changing action authority.c958aff37958faeb0f916f8661789c0ca090e7ddrestored the WAI-ARIA/APG/WCAG rationale that again matches executable behavior.8388b9ca841b8a6b6e4d094749986424d759ac49adds a rendered unavailable-action oracle that resolvesaria-describedbyto the visible localized project requirement, checks localized recovery titles, keeps controls natively focusable, and proves guarded clicks do not invoke the desktop bridge.Earlier maintenance also added the file-specific enabled Open tooltip while preserving the disabled recovery hint. Predecessor-head checks and reviews remain historical only.
Exact-head verification state
Repository workflows for current head
8388b9ca841b8a6b6e4d094749986424d759ac49are dispatched and currently queued; queued evidence is non-passing.The preceding exact-head security-audit reproduction checked out the PR merge ref and failed on the protected-base npm dependency baseline:
nanoid <3.3.18,pdfjs-dist <6.2.108, andundici <=7.28.0. Those dependency findings are owned by canonical dependency-security PR #783 and are not suppressed or duplicated here. Protected-base dependency-lifecycle checkout credential hardening remains #894-owned.Current actionable inline review threads are zero. There is no qualifying independent non-author exact-current-head approval. Historical OpenCode
CHANGES_REQUESTEDsubmissions are on predecessor heads and do not establish the current-head verdict.Merge gate
Keep Draft until exact-current-head desktop lint/typecheck/tests/build, exact owned statement/branch/function/line coverage where exposed, repository CI/SAST/security/SBOM/supply-chain gates and central review/coverage are terminal-success; dependency-root order is satisfied and revalidated; all actionable threads remain resolved; a qualifying independent non-author last-push approval exists; and branch protection permits merge without bypass.
Queued, in-progress, failed inherited-base, skipped-required, predecessor-head, self/author, protected-base, or administrative-bypass evidence is not success.
Supersession
This canonical review entry supersedes narrower or drifted tooltip/accessibility branches #787, #829, #830, #851, and #915. Unique behavior retained from those branches remains represented by executable tests on this branch.