Skip to content

feat(automation): run contextual-orchestrator hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair - #1068

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/contextual-orchestrator-hourly-review-repair
Open

feat(automation): run contextual-orchestrator hourly NVIDIA NIM review repair#1068
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/contextual-orchestrator-hourly-review-repair

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Buyer-perceivable gap

Commercial contextual-orchestrator buyers still had no hourly NVIDIA NIM
review-repair heartbeat after Clearfolio, DiskSage, and fast-mlsirm already
received one. Inkspan/naruon (#796) and BandScope (#817) callers remain
independent heads.

Unique source

Thin minute-17 caller only. Queue classification, RCA, repair dispatch, and
NVIDIA_NIM_API_KEY stay on the existing central worker. The caller never
receives COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN or secrets: inherit.

Checks 재검증

Local pytest+coverage+interrogate ran twice: 1121 passed, coverage 100%,
interrogate 100%.

GitHub review/Checks wait is not a blocker.

…w repair

Add a thin minute-17 caller so the LLM routing hub receives the same
bounded review-repair heartbeat as Clearfolio, DiskSage, and fast-mlsirm
without copying scheduler, model, or credential logic.

NVIDIA_NIM_API_KEY stays on the separately reviewed worker. The caller
never receives COPILOT_GITHUB_TOKEN.
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 16, 2026 21:54
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 3 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 1 included review currently available under your plan.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 3d94b3b2-471e-4b81-bbfd-e711b01b397c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c47afc2 and 10398c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • .github/workflows/contextual-orchestrator-hourly-review-repair.yml
  • .github/workflows/hourly-nvidia-nim-review-repair.yml
  • AGENTS.md
  • ARCHITECTURE.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • docs/automation/hourly-review-repair.md
  • docs/doctoring/contextual-orchestrator-hourly-review-caller.md
  • tests/test_contextual_orchestrator_hourly_review_caller.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 18, 2026 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant