Skip to content

Conversation

@shaeespring
Copy link
Contributor

Add gatekeep requirements to follow ComputerScienceHouse/Constitution#260

@shaeespring shaeespring requested a review from costowell October 14, 2025 01:17
Copy link
Contributor

@costowell costowell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a little more polish and it should be good to go!

@shaeespring shaeespring requested a review from costowell October 19, 2025 01:45
Copy link
Contributor

@costowell costowell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

Copy link
Contributor

@costowell costowell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops one last thing after talking to you

@shaeespring shaeespring requested a review from costowell November 3, 2025 15:57
Copy link
Contributor

@BigSpaceships BigSpaceships left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't tested it yet (on the struggle bus with conditional) Functionally LGTM, just a few formatting and small html things. Also can you also add the env variables to the docker compose file?

@BigSpaceships
Copy link
Contributor

Tested actual functionality and it seems to work 👍

@goosenotduck
Copy link

You should document VOTE_TOKEN in the README

@goosenotduck goosenotduck self-requested a review November 3, 2025 17:54
Copy link

@goosenotduck goosenotduck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested locally, all functional under my test cases:

  • User passes gatekeep and can vote
  • User fails gatekeep and cannot vote
  • User fails gatekeep and is waived and is able to vote

Please add documentation to README
Schtick: CONDITIONAL_URL should be VOTE_CONDITONAL_URL for consistency.

Copy link
Contributor

@BigSpaceships BigSpaceships left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! nice work

Copy link
Contributor

@tallen42 tallen42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, tested and confirmed working

Copy link

@goosenotduck goosenotduck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@tallen42 tallen42 merged commit 82d321a into ComputerScienceHouse:dev Nov 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants