-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
gatekeep #34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gatekeep #34
Conversation
costowell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a little more polish and it should be good to go!
costowell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great!
costowell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops one last thing after talking to you
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't tested it yet (on the struggle bus with conditional) Functionally LGTM, just a few formatting and small html things. Also can you also add the env variables to the docker compose file?
|
Tested actual functionality and it seems to work 👍 |
|
You should document VOTE_TOKEN in the README |
goosenotduck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested locally, all functional under my test cases:
- User passes gatekeep and can vote
- User fails gatekeep and cannot vote
- User fails gatekeep and is waived and is able to vote
Please add documentation to README
Schtick: CONDITIONAL_URL should be VOTE_CONDITONAL_URL for consistency.
BigSpaceships
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! nice work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, tested and confirmed working
goosenotduck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Add gatekeep requirements to follow ComputerScienceHouse/Constitution#260