Add Wan-FUN Camera Control models and Add WanCameraImageToVideo node

[George0726]

VideoX-Fun recently released two models for camera control, Wan2.1-Fun-V1.1-1.3B-Control-Camera and Wan2.1-Fun-V1.1-14B-Control-Camera.

To support these two models, I add a new node WanCameraImageToVideo, for customizing inputs for camera control models.

I also added a node VideoAcc_CameraTrajectoryRecam to calculate Plücker embeddings as the input of WanCameraImageToVideo node, in my customized node repo.

Here I attached the JSON workflow for your reference.
wan2.1_fun_Camera_Control.json

[George0726]

I uploaded two different versions of quantization models to the community.
https://huggingface.co/George0667/Wan2.1-Fun-V1.1-Control-Camera-quantization/tree/main

[George0726]

You wrote two hyperlinks tha points to the same model

Is the other one this one ? https://huggingface.co/alibaba-pai/Wan2.1-Fun-V1.1-14B-Control-Camera

There are also two other models that are the same but without the camera word (just 1.3B-Control and 14B-Control) No idea what these are

Yep sorry, it should be https://huggingface.co/alibaba-pai/Wan2.1-Fun-V1.1-14B-Control-Camera and https://huggingface.co/alibaba-pai/Wan2.1-Fun-V1.1-1.3B-Control-Camera

[comfyanonymous]

I don't think the camera_conditions should be of type LATENT because it's confusing, it should be a different type like WAN_CAMERA_EMBEDDING. Can you also make it an optional input like the start image?

You should also include a node that can generate some basic camera_conditions in this pr.

[George0726]

I don't think the camera_conditions should be of type LATENT because it's confusing, it should be a different type like WAN_CAMERA_EMBEDDING. Can you also make it an optional input like the start image?

You should also include a node that can generate some basic camera_conditions in this pr.

I have updated the code based on your suggestions.