Release 0.9.0 #17
Release 0.9.0 #17
Conversation
…senter* by directly using generic T - Added *IsVisible<T>* method to the *IUiService*. It requests the visibility state of *UiPresenter* - Added IReadOnlyList property *VisiblePresenters* to the *IUiService* to allow external entities to access the list of visible *UiPresenter* ***Changed**: - Removed *GetAllVisibleUi()* method. Use *IsVisible<T>* method instead
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
CHANGELOG.md (2)
10-12: Maintain consistent markdown formatting for technical terms.While the content is clear, the markdown formatting should be consistent. Consider applying italics (*) to all technical terms:
-Added *GetUi<T>* method to the *IUiService*. It requests the *UiPresenter* by directly using generic T -Added *IsVisible<T>* method to the *IUiService*. It requests the visibility state of *UiPresenter* -Added IReadOnlyList property *VisiblePresenters* to the *IUiService* to allow external entities to access the list of visible *UiPresenter* +Added *GetUi<T>* method to the *IUiService*. It requests the *UiPresenter* by directly using generic *T* +Added *IsVisible<T>* method to the *IUiService*. It requests the visibility state of *UiPresenter* +Added *IReadOnlyList* property *VisiblePresenters* to the *IUiService* to allow external entities to access the list of visible *UiPresenter*
14-15: Fix formatting and enhance migration guidance.Two suggestions for improvement:
- Fix the "Changed" header formatting
- Provide more context about the migration path
-***Changed**: -- Removed *GetAllVisibleUi()* method. Use *IsVisible<T>* method instead +**Changed**: +- Removed *GetAllVisibleUi()* method. Use *IsVisible<T>* method instead for checking individual presenter visibility, or use *VisiblePresenters* property for accessing all visible presentersRuntime/UiService.cs (1)
77-81: Add XML documentation for IsVisible.The implementation is correct, but would benefit from clear documentation.
Add XML documentation to clarify the method's purpose:
+/// <summary> +/// Checks if a UI presenter of type T is currently visible. +/// </summary> +/// <typeparam name="T">The type of UI presenter to check.</typeparam> +/// <returns>True if the UI presenter is visible, false otherwise.</returns> public bool IsVisible<T>() where T : UiPresenter { return _visibleUiList.Contains(typeof(T)); }Runtime/IUiService.cs (2)
20-24: Fix typo in documentationThere's a minor typo in the documentation where "currently" is repeated.
- /// Gets a read-only list of the Presenters currently currently visible and were opened by the UI service. + /// Gets a read-only list of the Presenters currently visible and were opened by the UI service.The property implementation itself looks good, providing a clean way to access visible presenters.
46-51: Fix typo in documentationThere's a typo in the documentation where "visible" is misspelled as "visble".
- /// <returns>True if the UI is visble, false otherwise</returns> + /// <returns>True if the UI is visible, false otherwise</returns>The method implementation looks good, providing a type-safe way to check UI visibility.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)Runtime/IUiService.cs(2 hunks)Runtime/UiService.cs(3 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
package.json (2)
5-5: LGTM: Version bump aligns with feature additions.
The increment to version 0.9.0 appropriately reflects the addition of new features (GetUi<T>, IsVisible<T>, and VisiblePresenters).
6-6: Verify the Unity version downgrade from 2022.4 to 2022.3.
This change appears to be a version downgrade. While this might be intentional to support the LTS version, please confirm if this is the desired compatibility target.
Let's check the Unity version requirements in related packages and documentation:
✅ Verification successful
Unity version 2022.3 is appropriate for this package
The version change to Unity 2022.3 is valid and appropriate because:
- 2022.3 is the current LTS (Long Term Support) version of Unity
- The package only depends on
com.unity.addressablesversion 1.22.0, which is compatible with Unity 2022.3 - No Unity APIs or features specific to 2022.4 are being used in the codebase
- The package's assembly definitions don't specify any Unity version constraints
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Unity version requirements across the codebase
# Look for any Unity version references in documentation or related files
rg -g "!package.json" "202[0-9]\.[0-9]"
# Check if there are any Unity-specific APIs or features that might require 2022.4
fd -e cs -e asmdef . --exec rg -l "UnityEngine" {}
Length of output: 483
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Unity version references in project configuration files and documentation
rg -g "*.md" -g "*.txt" -g "*.json" -g "*.asmdef" "unity" -i
# Check package dependencies that might have Unity version constraints
cat package.json
# Look for any Unity version requirements in assembly definitions
fd -e asmdef . --exec cat {}
Length of output: 6551
CHANGELOG.md (1)
8-9: LGTM! Version header follows the standard format.
The version number and date are properly formatted according to Keep a Changelog guidelines.
Runtime/UiService.cs (1)
34-35: Verify migration from GetAllVisibleUi() to new APIs.
Since GetAllVisibleUi() has been removed in favor of IsVisible and VisiblePresenters, we should verify that all existing callers have been updated.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for any potential callers of the old API to ensure complete migration.
Based on the comprehensive code analysis, I can now provide the final response:
Migration from GetAllVisibleUi() appears complete and correct
The codebase shows:
- No remaining references to
GetAllVisibleUi()except in the changelog where it documents its removal - The new APIs (
IsVisible<T>andVisiblePresenters) are properly implemented in both interface (IUiService) and implementation (UiService) - No callers of the old
GetAllVisibleUi()method were found, suggesting the migration is complete
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to GetAllVisibleUi
rg "GetAllVisibleUi"
# Search for new API usage to confirm migration
echo "Checking usage of new APIs..."
rg "IsVisible<|VisiblePresenters"
Length of output: 881
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files that might be using UI-related functionality
fd -e cs -E "*Test*" | xargs rg -l "UiService|UiPresenter"
# Then get the content of these files to analyze the usage
echo "=== Detailed content of UI-related files ==="
fd -e cs -E "*Test*" | xargs rg -A 5 "UiService|UiPresenter"
Length of output: 25814
Runtime/IUiService.cs (2)
36-44: LGTM! Well-documented and properly typed
The method is well-implemented with:
- Appropriate generic constraint to
UiPresenter - Clear documentation including exception cases
- Proper return type specification
Line range hint 1-1: Verify removal of GetAllVisibleUi()
The removal of GetAllVisibleUi() is well-covered by the new VisiblePresenters property and IsVisible<T>() method. Let's verify there are no remaining references to the removed method.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of GetAllVisibleUi() is clean and complete
The verification confirms that:
- No references to
GetAllVisibleUi()exist in the codebase - The functionality is properly replaced by
VisiblePresentersproperty andIsVisible<T>()method in both interface and implementation - The implementation maintains the visibility tracking through
_visibleUiList
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to GetAllVisibleUi()
# This helps ensure the removal is complete and won't cause runtime issues
echo "Searching for remaining references to GetAllVisibleUi..."
rg "GetAllVisibleUi" --type-add 'csharp:*.{cs,cshtml}' -t csharp
Length of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search approach:
# 1. First, find all C# files
echo "=== Finding all C# files ==="
fd -e cs
# 2. Then search for any UI-related service interfaces and implementations
echo -e "\n=== Searching for UI service related files ==="
fd -e cs . | grep -i "ui.*service\|service.*ui"
# 3. Look for any references to methods with "visible" in their name
echo -e "\n=== Searching for visibility-related methods ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'GetAll$_Visible$_'
Length of output: 857
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation files to verify the removal is complete
# Check UiService.cs implementation
echo "=== Checking UiService.cs ==="
cat Runtime/UiService.cs
# Check for any test files that might reference the old method
echo -e "\n=== Looking for test files ==="
fd -e cs . | grep -i "test\|spec"
# Look for any method calls that might be similar
echo -e "\n=== Checking for similar method calls ==="
rg "GetAll.*Ui|Visible.*Ui" --type-add 'csharp:*.{cs,cshtml}' -t csharp
Length of output: 9447
| /// <inheritdoc /> | ||
| public IReadOnlyList<Type> VisiblePresenters => new List<Type>(_visibleUiList); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider caching the VisiblePresenters list for better performance.
The current implementation creates a new List on every property access. For frequent access patterns, this could impact performance.
Consider caching the list and invalidating it only when the visible presenters change:
+private IReadOnlyList<Type> _cachedVisiblePresenters;
+private bool _visiblePresentersDirty = true;
-public IReadOnlyList<Type> VisiblePresenters => new List<Type>(_visibleUiList);
+public IReadOnlyList<Type> VisiblePresenters
+{
+ get
+ {
+ if (_visiblePresentersDirty || _cachedVisiblePresenters == null)
+ {
+ _cachedVisiblePresenters = new List<Type>(_visibleUiList);
+ _visiblePresentersDirty = false;
+ }
+ return _cachedVisiblePresenters;
+ }
+}Then set _visiblePresentersDirty = true in methods that modify _visibleUiList:
- OpenUi
- CloseUi
- CloseAllUi
- RemoveUi
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| /// <inheritdoc /> | ||
| public T GetUi<T>() where T : UiPresenter | ||
| { | ||
| return _uiPresenters[typeof(T)] as T; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and XML documentation for GetUi.
The current implementation has potential failure points:
- KeyNotFoundException if the presenter doesn't exist
- InvalidCastException if T doesn't match the actual presenter type
Consider this safer implementation with proper documentation:
+/// <summary>
+/// Gets a UI presenter of type T if it exists in the loaded presenters.
+/// </summary>
+/// <typeparam name="T">The type of UI presenter to retrieve.</typeparam>
+/// <returns>The UI presenter of type T.</returns>
+/// <exception cref="KeyNotFoundException">Thrown when the UI presenter is not loaded.</exception>
+/// <exception cref="InvalidCastException">Thrown when the loaded presenter doesn't match type T.</exception>
public T GetUi<T>() where T : UiPresenter
{
- return _uiPresenters[typeof(T)] as T;
+ if (!_uiPresenters.TryGetValue(typeof(T), out var presenter))
+ {
+ throw new KeyNotFoundException($"UI presenter of type {typeof(T)} is not loaded.");
+ }
+
+ if (presenter is not T typedPresenter)
+ {
+ throw new InvalidCastException($"Loaded presenter is of type {presenter.GetType()} which cannot be cast to {typeof(T)}");
+ }
+
+ return typedPresenter;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /// <inheritdoc /> | |
| public T GetUi<T>() where T : UiPresenter | |
| { | |
| return _uiPresenters[typeof(T)] as T; | |
| } | |
| /// <summary> | |
| /// Gets a UI presenter of type T if it exists in the loaded presenters. | |
| /// </summary> | |
| /// <typeparam name="T">The type of UI presenter to retrieve.</typeparam> | |
| /// <returns>The UI presenter of type T.</returns> | |
| /// <exception cref="KeyNotFoundException">Thrown when the UI presenter is not loaded.</exception> | |
| /// <exception cref="InvalidCastException">Thrown when the loaded presenter doesn't match type T.</exception> | |
| public T GetUi<T>() where T : UiPresenter | |
| { | |
| if (!_uiPresenters.TryGetValue(typeof(T), out var presenter)) | |
| { | |
| throw new KeyNotFoundException($"UI presenter of type {typeof(T)} is not loaded."); | |
| } | |
| if (presenter is not T typedPresenter) | |
| { | |
| throw new InvalidCastException($"Loaded presenter is of type {presenter.GetType()} which cannot be cast to {typeof(T)}"); | |
| } | |
| return typedPresenter; | |
| } |
*Changed:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes for Version 0.9.0
New Features
GetUi<T>()for retrieving UI presenters andIsVisible<T>()for checking their visibility.VisiblePresentersproperty to access currently visible UI presenters.Bug Fixes
Chores