4 database schema and migration #13
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

ℹ️ Issue
Closes Database schema & migration #4
📝 Description
Created Donation TypeORM according to acceptance criteria
Added files:
apps/backend/src/donations/donation.entity.ts
apps/backend/src/migrations/1758917198934-add_donations.ts
Changed files:
apps/backend/src/data-source.ts
✔️ Verification
Tested:
yarn docker:up:dev -> leads to (in postgres cli)
fcc_dev=# \dt
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner
--------+------------+-------+----------
public | migrations | table | postgres
(1 row)
yarn docker:migrate:dev -> leads to (in postgres cli)
fcc_dev=# \dt
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner
--------+------------+-------+----------
public | donations | table | postgres
public | migrations | table | postgres
public | users | table | postgres
(3 rows)
yarn docker:migrate:revert -> leads to (in postgres cli)
fcc_dev=# \dt
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner
--------+------------+-------+----------
public | migrations | table | postgres
(1 row)
Also the table schema in postgres cli:

🏕️ (Optional) Future Work / Notes
Users and Donations table are being migrated together through this implementation: Is this fine or is this not good practice?