Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spelling and init script changes #62

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2019
Merged

Conversation

wferi
Copy link

@wferi wferi commented Jan 11, 2019

No description provided.

@kgaillot
Copy link

looks good to me

@wferi
Copy link
Author

wferi commented Jan 11, 2019

Er, I don't really think the first commit is actually "Debian specific". That's just a note for myself from before I made the sourcing of /lib/lsb/init-functions opportunistic.

@wenningerk
Copy link

Guess we have both patches already in PR#45 (with a comment from Ken regarding avoidance of a phrasing that isn't wrong but sounded suboptimal to my non-native-speaker mind) and PR#46 (with a reference to PR#12 that as well tries to go into the direction of LSB conformity and without the init-functions sourcing).
Well, both are definitely a step in the right direction. And PRs sitting there waiting till eternity for perfection and 100-percent agreement don't really make sense...

@wenningerk wenningerk merged commit 2d595fd into ClusterLabs:master Jan 14, 2019
@wferi wferi deleted the to-upstream branch January 14, 2019 09:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants