-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking pseudotime and interface for PseudoSteppingSchemes #240
Conversation
@adelinehillier we're getting [ Info: Testing EnsembleKalmanInversion construcation and basic iteration (Nbatch = 2)...
EnsembleKalmanInversions construction and iteration tests (Nbatch = 2): Error During Test at /Users/gregorywagner/Projects/ParameterEstimocean.jl/test/test_ensemble_kalman_inversion.jl:71
Got exception outside of a @test
PosDefException: matrix is not Hermitian; Cholesky factorization failed.
Stacktrace:
[1] checkpositivedefinite(info::Int64)
@ LinearAlgebra /Users/julia/buildbot/worker/package_macos64/build/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/LinearAlgebra/src/factorization.jl:18
[2] cholesky!(A::Matrix{Float64}, ::Val{false}; check::Bool)
@ LinearAlgebra /Users/julia/buildbot/worker/package_macos64/build/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/LinearAlgebra/src/cholesky.jl:282
[3] #cholesky#134
@ /Users/julia/buildbot/worker/package_macos64/build/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/LinearAlgebra/src/cholesky.jl:378 [inlined]
[4] cholesky (repeats 2 times)
@ /Users/julia/buildbot/worker/package_macos64/build/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.6/LinearAlgebra/src/cholesky.jl:378 [inlined] But this PR is supposed to be a refactor which doesn't affect functionality, so I'm not sure what happened. |
Very strange! I'll look into it. |
src/EnsembleKalmanInversions.jl
Outdated
@@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ function EnsembleKalmanInversion(inverse_problem; | |||
Xᵢ = unconstrained_parameters | |||
iteration = 0 | |||
pseudotime = 0.0 | |||
pseudo_Δt = 0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we use default 1.0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think 1.0 does make the most sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@sandreza you might be interested in this.