Improved Readability for Pop Quizzes in ROM- Microcontrollers

[aindree-2005]

Improved Readability for Pop Quizzes in ROM- Microcontrollers

Fixes #759

Changes done:

• Improved markdown formatting of quiz questions for better readability
• Standardized spacing and layout of quiz options
• Used Latex subscripts to improve visual clarity
• No changes made to answer correctness or quiz logic

✅️ By submitting this PR, I have verified the following

• Checked to see if a similar PR has already been opened 🤔️
• Reviewed the contributing guidelines 🔍️
• Sample preview link added (for all updated pages)
• Tried squashing the commits into one

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Standardized math formatting in quiz content: math expressions are now wrapped with LaTeX-style delimiters ($...$) for two ROM-capacity questions, improving readability and consistent spacing in multiple-choice options. No changes to the underlying formulas or meanings.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated markdown in the ROM microcontrollers documentation to change ASCII/plain math in two quiz questions to LaTeX-style inline math (wrapped with $...$) and adjusted spacing inside parentheses for all answer options. Removed the inline “No newline at end of file” marker and added a trailing newline. No semantic changes to formulas or correct answers; edits are formatting-only.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Linked Issues check	❓ Inconclusive	Changes partially address issue #759 objectives: LaTeX math formatting improves readability, but the PR description mentions Unicode subscripts/superscripts (log₂, 2ᴺ) which are not reflected in the file changes showing only LaTeX $ formatting.	Clarify whether the changes include Unicode subscripts/superscripts or only LaTeX formatting, as the raw summary shows only $ notation changes without Unicode characters.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The file changes only affect docs/seq-lsi/rom-microcontrollers.md with formatting updates to two quiz questions; all changes directly relate to improving readability as specified in linked issue #759.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Title check	✅ Passed	The pull request title accurately reflects the main change: improving readability of quiz formatting in ROM microcontrollers documentation by converting to LaTeX-style math notation.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents

In `@docs/seq-lsi/rom-microcontrollers.md`:
- Around line 83-86: Replace the Unicode math in the quiz options (e.g., the
strings "2ᴺ × (N + K + log₂ M)", "2ᴺ × (K + log₂ M)", "2ᴹ⁺ᴺ × (K + N)", "2ᴹ × (M
+ N)") with LaTeX-style notation consistent with the main content—e.g., use
\(2^N (N + K + \log_2 M)\), \(2^N (K + \log_2 M)\), \(2^{M+N} (K + N)\), \(2^M
(M + N)\)—and ensure any rendered output includes an accessible plain-text
fallback (like 2^N and log_2 M) for screen readers.
- Around line 71-74: Replace the Unicode superscript/subscript math in the quiz
option lines (e.g., "2ᴺ × (K + log₂ M)", "2ᴺ × (N + K + log₂ M)", "2ᴹ⁺ᴺ × (K +
N)", "2ᴹ × (M + N)") with LaTeX math notation to match the main content (e.g.,
use $2^N \times (K + \log_2 M)$, $2^{M+N} \times (K + N)$, etc.), and apply the
same replacement in Question 3 options so all formulas use consistent $...$
LaTeX formatting for accessibility and consistent rendering.