Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed accessibility of NoOpStringBuilderPool: private -> public #6244

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 5, 2023
Merged

fixed accessibility of NoOpStringBuilderPool: private -> public #6244

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 5, 2023

Conversation

shtannikov
Copy link
Contributor

The documentation is mentioned that NoOpStringBuilderPool class is needed in order to have custom naming convention with comments from xml docs. But there was no suitable version of NoOpStringBuilderPool: one lived in tests project, second was just private. So I merged these versions and marked as public

Closes #5261

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jun 5, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@michaelstaib
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 5, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@michaelstaib michaelstaib merged commit 9f21941 into ChilliCream:main Jun 5, 2023
This was referenced Sep 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The example usage of NoOpStringBuilderPool in CustomNamingConventions in the documentation is misleading
3 participants