Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hotfix Gemini finish twice. #4955 #4966 #4968

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

lloydzhou
Copy link
Collaborator

@lloydzhou lloydzhou commented Jul 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed an issue in the finish function of the GeminiProApi class to ensure it only calls the onFinish callback once, improving reliability and preventing potential duplicate actions.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 10, 2024

@lloydzhou is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The update ensures the finish method in the GeminiProApi class in google.ts is more robust by preventing multiple invocations of the options.onFinish callback, thus avoiding potential redundant operations or side effects.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/client/platforms/google.ts Updated the finish method in the GeminiProApi class to ensure options.onFinish is called only once.

Poem

In the code where logic blends,
A function's journey now transcends,
finish guarded, calls just one,
Ensuring tasks are neatly done.
🐇 Hops of joy for code refined,
Gemini's flow, no longer entwined. 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 844025e and 6885812.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/platforms/google.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/client/platforms/google.ts (1)

157-160: LGTM! Ensure correctness of options.onFinish invocations.

The code changes are approved. The introduction of the finished flag correctly ensures that options.onFinish is only called once, preventing multiple invocations.

@lloydzhou lloydzhou requested a review from Dogtiti July 10, 2024 11:02
@lloydzhou lloydzhou added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 10, 2024
@lloydzhou lloydzhou self-assigned this Jul 10, 2024
@lloydzhou lloydzhou merged commit ba6039f into ChatGPTNextWeb:main Jul 10, 2024
0 of 2 checks passed
@lloydzhou lloydzhou deleted the hotfix/google branch August 1, 2024 05:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants