-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Boolean operation syntactic sugar #569
Conversation
It might be worth mentioning in the docs that with Or perhaps just state |
@RubenRubens It looks like the lint check is failing. |
I think it's OK now. Thanks for the helpful comments. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #569 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.26% 93.94% -0.32%
==========================================
Files 29 31 +2
Lines 6348 6542 +194
Branches 675 712 +37
==========================================
+ Hits 5984 6146 +162
- Misses 226 258 +32
Partials 138 138
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There is a discussion in #568 about which operators we should include. Summing up, there are multiple options but... is this the way to go?
I'm happy with it and hopefully @adam-urbanczyk would be too. 😄 |
I think I'd still add |
+1 I think that's fine. |
Sphinx doesn't autosummary dunder methods (except Looks easier to just write a section manually than to make sphinx autosummary do what we want. Linking to #493. |
There's also this that shows up just after the lint check.
|
Yes, MyPy does not like monkey patching. Will fix it. |
@jmwright looks ready to me. Codecov complains about a docstring line... |
Ok, merging. |
No description provided.