linux-cachyos-deckify: Re-enable RCU lazy by default#387
Merged
Conversation
sirlucjan
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2025
Member
Author
|
Not sure if we should enable this by default for other kernels as well to help laptop users? I asked about this a long time ago (ad001a5#commitcomment-143615023), but we decided not to focus on it then. Other kernels and Arch Linux config seem to have this enabled. |
Member
|
I believe having it off by default was a deliberate choice. The wiki has guides on how to enable this via boot parameters, and I've been using that for a long time already. |
ptr1337
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2025
Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Stelmachenok <ventureo@cachyos.org>
ventureoo
force-pushed
the
rcu-lazy-deckify
branch
from
9b41c7e to
9de9677
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Perhaps this was just lost along with the last config sync (baea61c), but if it was intentional I'd like to hear reasons, as for Handled devices we'd like to keep battery life more at the expense of small performance regressions.