Skip to content

potentially redundent data names in CIF examples - powder data presentation #33

Open
@rowlesmr

Description

@rowlesmr

I think there are a few examples of redundant information being included in the CIF examples

eg:

In this example, _structure.space_group_id and _structure.phase_id are explicitly given, even though there are already values of _space_group.id and _pd_phase.id given. AFAIK, values for data names that are links are "autopopulated" if the data name they link is present in the same block. For example, you don't explicitly give a value to _cell.structure_id, below.

data_CuCr2O4

_audit_dataset.id 6bdf3aa2-a2d9-41a3-ae76-36af9af8ab19

_structure.id	CuCr2O4
_structure.space_group_id	fddd
_structure.phase_id    cucr2o4 
_pd_phase.id           cucr2o4
_pd_phase_mass.percent         98.7

_space_group.crystal_system	orthorhombic
_space_group.id	fddd
_space_group.laue_class	mmm
_space_group.name_h-m_alt	'F d d d'
_space_group.name_Hall           '-F 2uv 2vw'
#symops could go here

_cell.angle_alpha	90.0
_cell.angle_beta	90.0
_cell.angle_gamma	90.0
_cell.length_a	7.712
_cell.length_b	8.543
_cell.length_c	8.536
_cell.volume	562.481

loop_

   _atom_site.label
   _atom_site.type_symbol
   _atom_site.fract_x
   _atom_site.fract_y
   _atom_site.fract_z
      Cu                  Cu   0.125                 0.125                 0.125               
      Cr                  Cr   0.5                   0.5                   0.5                 
      O                   O    0.2457                0.2682                0.2674

(I also just noticed an error with this inasmuch as you can't give _pd_phase_mass.percent without also defining _pd_diffractogram.id.

.

This next example is clean: the _pd_refln.phase_id, _pd_phase_mass.phase_id, _refln.diffractogram_id, and _pd_phase_mass.diffractogram_id values are taken from the values of _pd_phase.id and _pd_diffractogram.id given in the block.

data_0H_cr2cuo4

_audit_dataset.id c5c4b947-0708-411e-b44b-e157f645fd23

_pd_diffractogram.id       0H_00
_pd_phase.id               cr2cuo4
_pd_phase_mass.percent     0.9888(4)

# The following assumes that _refln.diffractogram_id
# has been defined so that per-diffractogram results
# can be provided.

loop_
   _refln.index_h
   _refln.index_k
   _refln.index_l
   _refln.F_squared_meas
   _refln.F_squared_calc
   _refln.phase_calc
   _refln.d_spacing
  1    1    1    2923.7101  1848.8118    0.0    4.75465    
  0    2    2    50887.9824 44176.2312 180.0   3.01930    
  2    2    0    41129.5142 38146.8191 180.0   2.86244    
  2    0    2    40719.7976 38182.2594 180.0   2.86141   
# ...

# preferred orientation information also goes here

I just want to check that this truly is redundant information, and you're not having them there explicityly for any teaching (or other) purposes, before I start removing them.

some links:

# 2 x raw powder data using `_pd_diffractogram.diffrn_id` to

_pd_diffractogram.diffrn_id 11158 # <-proposed

_pd_diffractogram.diffrn_id 11080 # <-proposed

_structure.phase_id pbso4 # <- Proposed

_structure.space_group_id fddd

_structure.phase_id cucr2o4 # <- proposed

_structure.space_group_id c2c

_structure.phase_id cuo # <- proposed

_structure.space_group_id fddd

_structure.phase_id cr2cuo4

_structure.space_group_id fddd

_structure.phase_id cr2cuo4

_structure.space_group_id fddd

_structure.phase_id cr2cuo4

_structure.space_group_id c2c

_structure.phase_id cuo

_structure.space_group_id c2c

_structure.phase_id cuo

_structure.space_group_id c2c

_structure.phase_id cuo

_pd_diffractogram.diffrn_id 7K

_pd_diffractogram.diffrn_id 17K

_pd_diffractogram.diffrn_id 47K

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions