Update zenodo json template and report_results script

[apcraig]

PR checklist

• Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
  Update zenodo json template and report_results script
• Developer(s):
  apcraig
• Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.
• Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.
  Ran quick suite on gordon and report_results seems fine. hash #333a5a28ccd0b at https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/Test-Results/wiki/cice_by_hash_forks on Oct 18.
  Zenodo changes will have to be tested in the future.
• How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?
  • bit for bit
  • different at roundoff level
  • more substantial
• Does this PR create or have dependencies on Icepack or any other models?
  • Yes
  • No
• Does this PR add any new test cases?
  • Yes
  • No
• Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/. A test build of the technical docs will be performed as part of the PR testing.)
  • Yes
  • No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
    • Yes
    • No
• Please provide any additional information or relevant details below:

Zenodo json update based on feedback from zenodo folks. will test on next release.
Updated report_results to remove some of the reports and sync the icepack and CICE report_results script again.
Also updated .gitignore to ignore testsuite directories.

[eclare108213]

This looks fine, but I wonder about the "scheme": "doi" line. Scheme isn't listed as an option for related_identifiers in the doc Zenodo sent us to. It says the type (doi etc) is detected automatically. Maybe those should be left out? Or hopefully they're okay, backward compatible. You could also change @mattdturner 's affiliation, as long as you're doing a PR on this. Thanks @apcraig !

[apcraig]

I just updated the zenodo json file as suggested. I am running the full test suite on gordon on 4 compilers and everything looks bit-for-bit with the current master. I will post results when all tests are thru the queue, but I think it's all fine and we can move forward.

[phil-blain]

I guess while we are at it we could also ignore caselist.* files generated by cice.setup

[apcraig]

good idea, i'll add that in both cice and icepack and update shortly.