Merged
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideAdd end-to-end integration tests for AGI chat and autonomous file update workflows by introducing a new test module that dynamically loads target scripts, patches heavy dependencies, and runs asyncio-based assertions. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds integration tests for AGI workflows by creating a comprehensive test file that validates AGI chat integration and autonomous file update systems. The tests use mocking and stubbing techniques to test core functionality without running expensive operations.
- Adds integration tests for AGI chat functionality with neural-symbolic processing
- Adds integration tests for autonomous file update workflows
- Implements utility functions for dynamic module loading with selective code stripping
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
test_agi_workflows.py:93
- The test function combines multiple unrelated test scenarios (chat integration and file updates) into a single test. This makes it harder to identify which specific functionality failed. Consider splitting into separate test functions for better isolation and debugging.
def test_agi_workflow(tmp_path):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @Bryan-Roe - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
- The strip_instance approach using string replacement is brittle—consider refactoring the module to accept a configuration flag or using import hooks / dependency injection for cleaner side-effect control.
- Hard-coded file paths like '09-agi-development/agi_chat_integration.py' may break in different environments; use pathlib with project root detection or import the module directly instead of relying on literal paths.
- Rather than calling asyncio.run inside a synchronous test, you could leverage pytest-asyncio to declare async test functions and simplify the event loop management.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The strip_instance approach using string replacement is brittle—consider refactoring the module to accept a configuration flag or using import hooks / dependency injection for cleaner side-effect control.
- Hard-coded file paths like '09-agi-development/agi_chat_integration.py' may break in different environments; use pathlib with project root detection or import the module directly instead of relying on literal paths.
- Rather than calling asyncio.run inside a synchronous test, you could leverage pytest-asyncio to declare async test functions and simplify the event loop management.
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `test_agi_workflows.py:87` </location>
<code_context>
+ import logging
+ updater.logger = logging.getLogger("AutonomousFileUpdaterTest")
+
+ task = FileUpdateTask(str(tmp_dir / 'demo.txt'), 'create', content='sample', backup=False)
+ success = await updater.execute_file_task(task)
+ assert success
+ assert (tmp_dir / 'demo.txt').exists()
+
+
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
Missing tests for file update edge cases (e.g., update, delete, backup, restricted files)
Please add tests for 'update', 'delete', backup, and restricted file scenarios to ensure full coverage of AutonomousFileUpdater operations.
</issue_to_address>
<suggested_fix>
<<<<<<< SEARCH
task = FileUpdateTask(str(tmp_dir / 'demo.txt'), 'create', content='sample', backup=False)
success = await updater.execute_file_task(task)
assert success
assert (tmp_dir / 'demo.txt').exists()
=======
# Test file creation
task = FileUpdateTask(str(tmp_dir / 'demo.txt'), 'create', content='sample', backup=False)
success = await updater.execute_file_task(task)
assert success
assert (tmp_dir / 'demo.txt').exists()
# Test file update
update_task = FileUpdateTask(str(tmp_dir / 'demo.txt'), 'update', content='updated content', backup=False)
update_success = await updater.execute_file_task(update_task)
assert update_success
with open(tmp_dir / 'demo.txt', 'r') as f:
assert f.read() == 'updated content'
# Test file delete
delete_task = FileUpdateTask(str(tmp_dir / 'demo.txt'), 'delete', backup=False)
delete_success = await updater.execute_file_task(delete_task)
assert delete_success
assert not (tmp_dir / 'demo.txt').exists()
# Test file creation with backup
task_with_backup = FileUpdateTask(str(tmp_dir / 'demo2.txt'), 'create', content='backup test', backup=True)
backup_success = await updater.execute_file_task(task_with_backup)
assert backup_success
assert (tmp_dir / 'demo2.txt').exists()
# Now update with backup enabled and check backup exists
update_with_backup = FileUpdateTask(str(tmp_dir / 'demo2.txt'), 'update', content='backup updated', backup=True)
update_backup_success = await updater.execute_file_task(update_with_backup)
assert update_backup_success
backup_files = list(updater.backup_path.glob('demo2.txt*'))
assert len(backup_files) > 0
# Test restricted file scenario
restricted_file = tmp_dir / 'restricted.txt'
restricted_file.write_text('restricted')
updater.restricted_files = [str(restricted_file)]
restricted_task = FileUpdateTask(str(restricted_file), 'update', content='should not update', backup=False)
restricted_success = await updater.execute_file_task(restricted_task)
assert not restricted_success
# File content should remain unchanged
with open(restricted_file, 'r') as f:
assert f.read() == 'restricted'
updater.restricted_files = []
>>>>>>> REPLACE
</suggested_fix>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Bryan <74067792+Bryan-Roe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Bryan <74067792+Bryan-Roe@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Bryan <74067792+Bryan-Roe@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
test_agi_workflows.pycovering AGI chat integration and autonomous file update workflowsTesting
pytest -q test_agi_workflows.pyhttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6886a75ffe088322b319b0abb3b02f1f
Summary by Sourcery
Add end-to-end integration tests for AGI workflows by covering both chat processing and autonomous file update capabilities
New Features:
Enhancements:
Tests: