Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed coding standards for PR 680 #977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Fixed coding standards for PR 680 #977

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

avonville
Copy link
Contributor

fixes coding standards for #680

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.90%. Comparing base (2c3bd4b) to head (5dcdce2).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
Cache_File_Generic.php 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
Util_WpFile.php 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
Util_Rule.php 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master    #977      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage      0.90%   0.90%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    19589   19593       +4     
===========================================
  Files           677     677              
  Lines         98719   98741      +22     
===========================================
  Hits            893     893              
- Misses        97826   97848      +22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cssjoe cssjoe added this to the 2.8.0 milestone Oct 22, 2024
@cssjoe cssjoe merged commit 4b4a79b into master Oct 22, 2024
2 checks passed
@cssjoe cssjoe deleted the pr-680 branch October 22, 2024 21:20
@cssjoe cssjoe changed the title fixed coding standards for pr-680 Fixed coding standards for PR 680 Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants