Added ⚡️ content to Designing Bitcoin Products > Wallet Interoperability

[Bosch-0]

Added LN and other relevant content to wallet interoperability page (now just interoperability) for #471.

There is a lot of changes here but below are the main ones.

• Added LN content throughout
• Renamed page from Wallet interoperability to Interoperability and made content throughout more general / application specific where relevant.
• Added two new sections: user interface and hardware wallets.
• Updated a lot of the images to be mobile focused / more clear in what they are depicting.
• Re-ordered based on my perceived importance / most relevant to the guides primary use case currently.

Live preview

[Bosch-0]

Another suggestion, what do you guys think about adding a section on BIPs and BOLTs here? Adhering to these standards is by definition making things more interoperable. I'll leave it as is for now and open another PR with these additions if people agree.

[GBKS]

Good update. Left a few comments. Also make sure to run rake test in order to catch broken links.

[pavlenex]

Some really awesome suggestions.

I really like what you did with Bolt, LNRURL, suggestions. Glad you included the ability to choose different LSP, this is important.

My only nit-pick is using on-chain vs base layer which is what we used in other chapters preferably.

[Bosch-0]

Ty @pavlenex, addressed :)

[sbddesign]

Great work @Bosch-0 🎉

You and I already discussed technical stuff in the Google doc; I think we cleared that up.

I left several grammatical and stylistic suggestions. While some of these are my opinion in terms of what reads better, there are many about rules of grammar and punctuation.

[sbddesign]

Another suggestion, what do you guys think about adding a section on BIPs and BOLTs here? Adhering to these standards is by definition making things more interoperable. I'll leave it as is for now and open another PR with these additions if people agree.

That's a good question. Personally, I feel like it might be unneeded overhead. A better approach might be to reference BIPS and BOLTS when necessary (which you already do on the page). For example, "your wallet should support X feature which is defined in BOLT ## blah blah blah..."

[pavlenex]

@Bosch-0 great work once again. Just two minor suggestions and a question, and this looks ready to go.